» Articles » PMID: 1916486

Relation Between Electromyography and Anal Manometry of the External Anal Sphincter

Overview
Journal Gut
Specialty Gastroenterology
Date 1991 Sep 1
PMID 1916486
Citations 4
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Thirteen patients with faecal incontinence and 26 control subjects were studied to investigate whether a quantitative electromyographic (EMG) signal could be correlated to anal manometry. Three different electrodes were used--a concentric needle electrode, a disposable sponge electrode, and a hard anal plug electrode. The maximum amplitude of the EMG recording was used as a quantitative parameter. Linear regression showed significant correlation between EMG and anal manometry with the sponge electrode, both at rest and during squeeze. Significant correlation was also found with the concentric needle electrode during squeeze but not at rest. No correlation was found with the hard anal plug electrode either during squeeze or at rest. Reproducibility studies using the sponge electrode showed acceptable day to day variation. In conclusion, quantitative EMG recordings from a disposable sponge electrode placed in the anal canal correlate well to anal manometry and may be used for assessment of sphincter function, but the hard anal plug electrode cannot be recommended.

Citing Articles

Expert consensus document: Advances in the evaluation of anorectal function.

Carrington E, Scott S, Bharucha A, Mion F, Remes-Troche J, Malcolm A Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2018; 15(5):309-323.

PMID: 29636555 PMC: 6028941. DOI: 10.1038/nrgastro.2018.27.


Normative values in anorectal manometry using microtip technology: a cohort study in 172 subjects.

Schuld J, Kollmar O, Schluter C, Schilling M, Richter S Int J Colorectal Dis. 2012; 27(9):1199-205.

PMID: 22614682 DOI: 10.1007/s00384-012-1499-2.


Anal sphincteric neurogenic injury in asymptomatic nulliparous women and fecal incontinence.

Bharucha A, Daube J, Litchy W, Traue J, Edge J, Enck P Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol. 2012; 303(2):G256-62.

PMID: 22575218 PMC: 3404566. DOI: 10.1152/ajpgi.00099.2012.


Anorectal physiology measurements are of no value in clinical practice. True or false?.

Carty N, Moran B, Johnson C Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 1994; 76(4):276-80.

PMID: 8074392 PMC: 2502250.

References
1.
Bland J, Altman D . Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet. 1986; 1(8476):307-10. View

2.
Lestar B, Penninckx F, KERREMANS R . The composition of anal basal pressure. An in vivo and in vitro study in man. Int J Colorectal Dis. 1989; 4(2):118-22. DOI: 10.1007/BF01646870. View

3.
Pedersen I, Christiansen J . A study of the physiological variation in anal manometry. Br J Surg. 1989; 76(1):69-70. DOI: 10.1002/bjs.1800760121. View

4.
Wunderlich M, Teleky B, Schiessel R . [Sphincter function following colo-anal anastomosis]. Langenbecks Arch Chir. 1986; 367(4):259-69. DOI: 10.1007/BF01263406. View

5.
Swash M . New concepts in incontinence. Br Med J (Clin Res Ed). 1985; 290(6461):4-5. PMC: 1415404. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.290.6461.4. View