» Articles » PMID: 19154578

Identifying Differential Exon Splicing Using Linear Models and Correlation Coefficients

Overview
Publisher Biomed Central
Specialty Biology
Date 2009 Jan 22
PMID 19154578
Citations 15
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: With the availability of the Affymetrix exon arrays a number of tools have been developed to enable the analysis. These however can be expensive or have several pre-installation requirements. This led us to develop an analysis workflow for analysing differential splicing using freely available software packages that are already being widely used for gene expression analysis. The workflow uses the packages in the standard installation of R and Bioconductor (BiocLite) to identify differential splicing. We use the splice index method with the LIMMA framework. The main drawback with this approach is that it relies on accurate estimates of gene expression from the probe-level data. Methods such as RMA and PLIER may misestimate when a large proportion of exons are spliced. We therefore present the novel concept of a gene correlation coefficient calculated using only the probeset expression pattern within a gene. We show that genes with lower correlation coefficients are likely to be differentially spliced.

Results: The LIMMA approach was used to identify several tissue-specific transcripts and splicing events that are supported by previous experimental studies. Filtering the data is necessary, particularly removing exons and genes that are not expressed in all samples and cross-hybridising probesets, in order to reduce the false positive rate. The LIMMA approach ranked genes containing single or few differentially spliced exons much higher than genes containing several differentially spliced exons. On the other hand we found the gene correlation coefficient approach better for identifying genes with a large number of differentially spliced exons.

Conclusion: We show that LIMMA can be used to identify differential exon splicing from Affymetrix exon array data. Though further work would be necessary to develop the use of correlation coefficients into a complete analysis approach, the preliminary results demonstrate their usefulness for identifying differentially spliced genes. The two approaches work complementary as they can potentially identify different subsets of genes (single/few spliced exons vs. large transcript structure differences).

Citing Articles

Comprehensive insights on pivotal prognostic signature involved in clear cell renal cell carcinoma microenvironment using the ESTIMATE algorithm.

Luo J, Xie Y, Zheng Y, Wang C, Qi F, Hu J Cancer Med. 2020; 9(12):4310-4323.

PMID: 32311223 PMC: 7300420. DOI: 10.1002/cam4.2983.


Unusual structure and splicing pattern of the vertebrate mitochondrial solute carrier SLC25A3 gene.

Calvello R, Cianciulli A, Panaro M J Genet. 2018; 97(1):225-233.

PMID: 29666342


A random effects model for the identification of differential splicing (REIDS) using exon and HTA arrays.

Van Moerbeke M, Kasim A, Talloen W, Reumers J, Gohlmann H, Shkedy Z BMC Bioinformatics. 2017; 18(1):273.

PMID: 28545391 PMC: 5445373. DOI: 10.1186/s12859-017-1687-8.


Algorithms for differential splicing detection using exon arrays: a comparative assessment.

Zimmermann K, Jentsch M, Rasche A, Hummel M, Leser U BMC Genomics. 2016; 16:136.

PMID: 27391904 PMC: 4391533. DOI: 10.1186/s12864-015-1322-x.


iGEMS: an integrated model for identification of alternative exon usage events.

Sood S, Szkop K, Nakhuda A, Gallagher I, Murie C, Brogan R Nucleic Acids Res. 2016; 44(11):e109.

PMID: 27095197 PMC: 4914109. DOI: 10.1093/nar/gkw263.


References
1.
OReilly M, Marshall E, Speirs H, Brown R . WNK1, a gene within a novel blood pressure control pathway, tissue-specifically generates radically different isoforms with and without a kinase domain. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2003; 14(10):2447-56. DOI: 10.1097/01.asn.0000089830.97681.3b. View

2.
Verissimo F, Jordan P . WNK kinases, a novel protein kinase subfamily in multi-cellular organisms. Oncogene. 2001; 20(39):5562-9. DOI: 10.1038/sj.onc.1204726. View

3.
Nakamura N, Miyake Y, Matsushita M, Tanaka S, Inoue H, Kanazawa H . KIF1Bbeta2, capable of interacting with CHP, is localized to synaptic vesicles. J Biochem. 2002; 132(3):483-91. DOI: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.jbchem.a003246. View

4.
Okoniewski M, Yates T, Dibben S, Miller C . An annotation infrastructure for the analysis and interpretation of Affymetrix exon array data. Genome Biol. 2007; 8(5):R79. PMC: 1929135. DOI: 10.1186/gb-2007-8-5-r79. View

5.
Irizarry R, Bolstad B, Collin F, Cope L, Hobbs B, Speed T . Summaries of Affymetrix GeneChip probe level data. Nucleic Acids Res. 2003; 31(4):e15. PMC: 150247. DOI: 10.1093/nar/gng015. View