» Articles » PMID: 19152203

A Meta-analysis of Retention in Methadone Maintenance by Dose and Dosing Strategy

Overview
Publisher Informa Healthcare
Specialty Psychiatry
Date 2009 Jan 20
PMID 19152203
Citations 65
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objective: To estimate, via meta-analysis, the influence of different methadone dose ranges and dosing strategies on retention rates in methadone maintenance treatment (MMT).

Methods: A systematic literature search identified 18 randomized controlled trials (RCTs) evaluating methadone dose and retention. Retention was defined as the percentage of patients remaining in treatment at a specified time point. After initial univariate analyses of retention by Pearson chi-squares, we used multilevel logistic regression to calculate summary odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals for the effects of methadone dose (above or below 60 mg/day), flexible vs. fixed dosing strategy, and duration of follow-up.

Results: The total number of opioid-dependent participants in the 18 studies was 2831, with 1797 in MMT and 1034 receiving alternative mediations or placebo. Each variable significantly predicted retention with the other variables controlled for. Retention was greater with methadone doses > or = 60 than with doses < 60 (OR: 1.74, 95% CI: 1.43-2.11). Similarly, retention was greater with flexible-dose strategies than with fixed-dose strategies (OR: 1.72, 95% CI: 1.41-2.11).

Conclusions: Higher doses of methadone and individualization of doses are each independently associated with better retention in MMT.

Citing Articles

Factors Associated with Relapses in Alcohol and Substance Use Disorder.

Yazici A, Bardakci M Eurasian J Med. 2024; 55(1):S75-S81.

PMID: 39128053 PMC: 11075040. DOI: 10.5152/eurasianjmed.2023.23335.


Modeling the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on achieving HCV elimination amongst young and unstably housed people who inject drugs in San Francisco.

Fraser H, Stone J, Facente S, Artenie A, Patel S, Wilson E Int J Drug Policy. 2024; 131:104452.

PMID: 38910096 PMC: 7617003. DOI: 10.1016/j.drugpo.2024.104452.


Persistence in the Methadone Maintenance Program and Its Relationship with the Medication Regimen Complexity Index in Opioid-Dependent Patients.

Alvaro-Alonso E, Gomez-Alvarez M, Segovia-Tapiador B, Del-Pino-Illaconza M, Valencia J, Ryan P Pharmaceuticals (Basel). 2024; 17(5).

PMID: 38794137 PMC: 11123973. DOI: 10.3390/ph17050567.


Shared decision-making and client-reported dose satisfaction in a longitudinal cohort receiving injectable opioid agonist treatment (iOAT).

Beaumont S, Magel T, MacDonald S, Harrison S, Schechter M, Oviedo-Joekes E Subst Abuse Treat Prev Policy. 2024; 19(1):1.

PMID: 38172882 PMC: 10763140. DOI: 10.1186/s13011-023-00585-4.


Patient reported goals for medications for opioid use disorder: A theory of proximal goal attainment.

Hohmeier K, Cernasev A, Leibold C, Moore T, Schlesinger E, Arce I Explor Res Clin Soc Pharm. 2023; 12:100345.

PMID: 37876851 PMC: 10590992. DOI: 10.1016/j.rcsop.2023.100345.


References
1.
Goldstein A, Judson B . Proceedings: Efficacy and side effects of three widely different methadone doses. Proc Natl Conf Methadone Treat. 1973; 1:21-44. View

2.
DOLE V, Nyswander M, Kreek M . Narcotic blockade. Arch Intern Med. 1966; 118(4):304-9. View

3.
Trafton J, Minkel J, Humphreys K . Determining effective methadone doses for individual opioid-dependent patients. PLoS Med. 2006; 3(3):e80. PMC: 1360079. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pmed.0030080. View

4.
Strain E, Stitzer M, Liebson I, Bigelow G . Comparison of buprenorphine and methadone in the treatment of opioid dependence. Am J Psychiatry. 1994; 151(7):1025-30. DOI: 10.1176/ajp.151.7.1025. View

5.
Blaney T, Craig R . Methadone maintenance. Does dose determine differences in outcome?. J Subst Abuse Treat. 1999; 16(3):221-8. DOI: 10.1016/s0740-5472(98)00031-2. View