» Articles » PMID: 19152130

The RegEx Trial: a Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo- and Active-controlled Pilot Study Combining Regadenoson, a Selective A(2A) Adenosine Agonist, with Low-level Exercise, in Patients Undergoing Myocardial Perfusion Imaging

Overview
Journal J Nucl Cardiol
Date 2009 Jan 20
PMID 19152130
Citations 48
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Although vasodilator stress myocardial perfusion imaging (MPI) is increasingly performed with exercise, adenosine A(2A) receptor agonists have not been studied with exercise.

Objectives: To determine the safety of administering regadenoson during exercise and, secondarily, to evaluate image quality, patient acceptance, and detection of perfusion defects.

Methods: Patients requiring pharmacologic MPI received a standard adenosine-supine protocol (AdenoSup, n = 60) and were then randomized (2:1) in a double-blind manner to low-level exercise with bolus intravenous injection of regadenoson (RegEx, n = 39) or placebo (PlcEx, n = 21).

Results: Adverse events occurred in 95%, 77%, and 33% of patients receiving AdenoSup, RegEx, and PlcEx, respectively. Peak heart rate was 13 beats per minute (bpm) and 21 bpm greater following RegEx compared to that following PlcEx and AdenoSup, respectively (P = .006 and <.001). Change from baseline in mean systolic blood pressure (SBP), change from baseline to nadir SBP, and percentage of patients with a decline in SBP by > or = 20 mm Hg showed no important differences between RegEx and PlcEx. No occurrences of 2nd degree or higher AV block were observed following RegEx or PlcEx; one patient developed 2nd degree AV block following AdenoSup. The mean heart-to-liver and heart-to-gut ratios were improved on RegEx vs AdenoSup: 0.85 (0.34) vs 0.65 (0.26), P < .001 and 1.1 (0.36) vs 0.97 (0.34), P < .001, respectively. Compared to AdenoSup, 70% of patients felt RegEx was much or somewhat better.

Conclusions: Combining regadenoson with low-level exercise is feasible, well tolerated, and associated with fewer side effects compared to AdenoSup.

Citing Articles

Adenosine 2A Receptor Agonism Improves Survival in Extracorporeal Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation.

Wisniewski A, Chancellor W, Young A, Money D, Beller J, Charlton J J Surg Res. 2024; 301:404-412.

PMID: 39029264 PMC: 11758288. DOI: 10.1016/j.jss.2024.06.033.


Adenosine vs Regadenoson Pharmacologic Stress Differs in Women with Suspected Coronary Microvascular Dysfunction: A Report from the Women's Ischemia Syndrome Evaluation-Coronary Vascular Dysfunction (WISE-CVD) Study.

Wei J, Jalnakupur S, Cruz S, Wiens G, Motwani M, Zhang X Cardiovasc Disord Med. 2023; 2019.

PMID: 36913201 PMC: 9997839. DOI: 10.31487/j.cdm.2019.01.01.


Pharmacological stress myocardial perfusion imaging after an inadequate exercise stress test.

Sharedalal P, Gerard P, Jain D J Nucl Cardiol. 2021; 29(4):1796-1798.

PMID: 34036527 DOI: 10.1007/s12350-021-02661-3.


Gender-related differences in side-effects and hemodynamic response to regadenoson in patients undergoing SPECT myocardial perfusion imaging.

Katsikis A, Kyrozi E, Manira V, Theodorakos A, Malamitsi J, Tsapaki V Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2019; 46(12):2590-2600.

PMID: 31414207 DOI: 10.1007/s00259-019-04463-9.


Structural re-positioning, in silico molecular modelling, oxidative degradation, and biological screening of linagliptin as adenosine 3 receptor (ADORA3) modulators targeting hepatocellular carcinoma.

Ayoub B, Attia Y, Ahmed M J Enzyme Inhib Med Chem. 2018; 33(1):858-866.

PMID: 29768061 PMC: 6010121. DOI: 10.1080/14756366.2018.1462801.


References
1.
Thomas G, Prill N, Majmundar H, Fabrizi R, Thomas J, Hayashida C . Treadmill exercise during adenosine infusion is safe, results in fewer adverse reactions, and improves myocardial perfusion image quality. J Nucl Cardiol. 2000; 7(5):439-46. DOI: 10.1067/mnc.2000.108030. View

2.
Miller D . Impact of selective adenosine A2A receptor agonists on cardiac imaging feeling the lightning, waiting on the thunder. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2005; 46(11):2076-8. DOI: 10.1016/j.jacc.2005.07.061. View

3.
Iskandrian A, Bateman T, Belardinelli L, Blackburn B, Cerqueira M, Hendel R . Adenosine versus regadenoson comparative evaluation in myocardial perfusion imaging: results of the ADVANCE phase 3 multicenter international trial. J Nucl Cardiol. 2007; 14(5):645-58. DOI: 10.1016/j.nuclcard.2007.06.114. View

4.
Feoktistov I, Biaggioni I . Pharmacological characterization of adenosine A2B receptors: studies in human mast cells co-expressing A2A and A2B adenosine receptor subtypes. Biochem Pharmacol. 1998; 55(5):627-33. DOI: 10.1016/s0006-2952(97)00512-1. View

5.
Shryock J, Belardinelli L . Adenosine and adenosine receptors in the cardiovascular system: biochemistry, physiology, and pharmacology. Am J Cardiol. 1997; 79(12A):2-10. DOI: 10.1016/s0002-9149(97)00256-7. View