» Articles » PMID: 19138768

Physical Tests for Patient Selection for Bone Mineral Density Measurements in Postmenopausal Women

Overview
Journal Bone
Date 2009 Jan 14
PMID 19138768
Citations 19
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Introduction: There is a need for cost-effective clinical methods to select women for bone densitometry. The aim of the present study was to determine whether relatively simple and clinically applicable physical tests could be useful in prediction of bone density in postmenopausal women.

Methods: A total of 606 women (age range 66-71 years) taking part in the population based OSTPRE Fracture Prevention Study were investigated. Spinal and femoral bone mineral density (BMD) was measured by Dual X-ray Absorptiometry (DXA). Physical tests included the standing-on-one-foot (SOOF), grip strength (GS), leg extension strength, ability to squat down, standing 10 s eyes closed, chair rising, regular walk for 10 m and tandem walk for 6 m. All linear regression models were adjusted for age, body mass index, years on hormone therapy, years since menopause, current smoking and use of oral glucocorticoids.

Results: The SOOF was associated with lumbar spine BMD (r2=0.16, p=0.004) and the femoral regions (r2 values from 0.17 to 0.23 and p-values all<0.001). The GS was associated with lumbar spine BMD (r2=0.16, p=0.011) and the femoral regions (r2 values from 0.16 to 0.21 and p-values from <0.001 to 0.004). The ability to squat down on the floor was associated with the femoral regions (r2 values from 0.15 to 0.21 and p-values from 0.028 to 0.040). In addition, functional capacity was decreased in women with femoral neck osteoporosis (WHO classification) compared to women with normal or osteopenic BMD: SOOF -39% (p=0.001), GS -18% (p<0.001), leg extension strength -19% (p=0.007) and ability to squat down on the floor -40% (p=0.004). For osteoporosis prediction (ROC analysis) a threshold of a 22 kg in GS would yield a true-positive rate (sensitivity) of about 58% and a true-negative rate (specificity) of 86% (AUC 0.76).

Conclusions: We suggest that grip strength could be used in medical decision making to identify those women who would benefit from BMD measurements albeit alone it may not provide accurate enough tool for osteoporosis screening.

Citing Articles

Impact of fitness coach behavior on exercise motivation, commitment, and enjoyment: A longitudinal study.

Braga-Pereira R, Furtado G, Campos F, Sampaio A, Teques P PLoS One. 2025; 19(12):e0310931.

PMID: 39774396 PMC: 11684697. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0310931.


Identifying characteristics and clinical conditions associated with hand grip strength in adults: the Project Baseline Health Study.

Taylor K, Carroll M, Short S, Goode A Sci Rep. 2024; 14(1):8937.

PMID: 38637523 PMC: 11026445. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-55978-7.


Can the Eight Hop Test Be Measured with Sensors? A Systematic Review.

Pimenta L, Garcia N, Zdravevski E, Chorbev I, Trajkovik V, Lameski P Sensors (Basel). 2022; 22(9).

PMID: 35591272 PMC: 9105795. DOI: 10.3390/s22093582.


Physical capability, physical activity, and their association with femoral bone mineral density in adults aged 40 years and older: The Tromsø study 2015-2016.

Hauger A, Holvik K, Bergland A, Stahle A, Emaus N, Morseth B Osteoporos Int. 2021; 32(10):2083-2094.

PMID: 33864108 PMC: 8510966. DOI: 10.1007/s00198-021-05949-9.


Impacts of combined osteopenia/osteoporosis and sarcopenia on balance and quality of life in older adults.

Buyukavci R, Akturk S, Evren B, Ersoy Y North Clin Istanb. 2020; 7(6):585-590.

PMID: 33381698 PMC: 7754869. DOI: 10.14744/nci.2020.28003.