» Articles » PMID: 19124790

Efficacy of Pneumococcal Vaccination in Adults: a Meta-analysis

Overview
Journal CMAJ
Date 2009 Jan 7
PMID 19124790
Citations 135
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Clinical trials and meta-analyses have produced conflicting results of the efficacy of unconjugated pneumococcal polysaccharide vaccine in adults. We sought to evaluate the vaccine's efficacy on clinical outcomes as well as the methodologic quality of the trials.

Methods: We searched several databases and all bibliographies of reviews and meta-analyses for clinical trials that compared pneumococcal polysaccharide vaccine with a control. We examined rates of pneumonia and death, taking the methodologic quality of the trials into consideration.

Results: We included 22 trials involving 101 507 participants: 11 trials reported on presumptive pneumococcal pneumonia, 19 on all-cause pneumonia and 12 on all-cause mortality. The current 23-valent vaccine was used in 8 trials. The relative risk (RR) was 0.64 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.43-0.96) for presumptive pneumococcal pneumonia and 0.73 (95% CI 0.56-0.94) for all-cause pneumonia. There was significant heterogeneity between the trials reporting on presumptive pneumonia (I(2) = 74%, p < 0.001) and between those reporting on all-cause pneumonia (I(2) = 90%, p < 0.001). The RR for all-cause mortality was 0.97 (95% CI 0.87-1.09), with moderate heterogeneity between trials (I(2) = 44%, p = 0.053). Trial quality, especially regarding double blinding, explained a substantial proportion of the heterogeneity in the trials reporting on presumptive pneumonia and all-cause pneumonia. There was little evidence of vaccine protection in trials of higher methodologic quality (RR 1.20, 95% CI 0.75-1.92, for presumptive pneumonia; and 1.19, 95% CI 0.95-1.49, for all-cause pneumonia in double-blind trials; p for heterogeneity > 0.05). The results for all-cause mortality in double-blind trials were similar to those in all trials combined. There was little evidence of vaccine protection among elderly patients or adults with chronic illness in analyses of all trials (RR 1.04, 95% CI 0.78-1.38, for presumptive pneumococcal pneumonia; 0.89, 95% CI 0.69-1.14, for all-cause pneumonia; and 1.00, 95% CI 0.87-1.14, for all-cause mortality).

Interpretation: Pneumococcal vaccination does not appear to be effective in preventing pneumonia, even in populations for whom the vaccine is currently recommended.

Citing Articles

Glycyrrhetinic acid reduces lung inflammation caused by pneumococcal infection by reducing the toxicity of pneumolysin.

Xu Y, Ding Y, Wu H, Li D, Li Y, Hu Y Heliyon. 2024; 10(19):e38611.

PMID: 39397991 PMC: 11471213. DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e38611.


Novel method for production and purification of untagged pneumococcal surface protein A from clade 1.

da Costa Rodrigues T, Zorzete P, Miyaji E, Goncalves V Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2024; 108(1):281.

PMID: 38570417 PMC: 10990985. DOI: 10.1007/s00253-024-13098-2.


Bacterial Vaccinations in Patients with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease.

Paroczai D, Burian K, Bikov A Vaccines (Basel). 2024; 12(2).

PMID: 38400196 PMC: 10893474. DOI: 10.3390/vaccines12020213.


The remarkable history of pneumococcal vaccination: an ongoing challenge.

Musher D, Anderson R, Feldman C Pneumonia (Nathan). 2022; 14(1):5.

PMID: 36153636 PMC: 9509586. DOI: 10.1186/s41479-022-00097-y.


Metformin Attenuates Inflammatory Responses and Enhances Antibody Production in an Acute Pneumonia Model of .

Lee G, Moreira A, Hinojosa C, Benavides R, Winter C, Anderson A Front Aging. 2022; 3:736835.

PMID: 35821804 PMC: 9261336. DOI: 10.3389/fragi.2022.736835.


References
1.
Fine M, Smith M, Carson C, Meffe F, Sankey S, Weissfeld L . Efficacy of pneumococcal vaccination in adults. A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Arch Intern Med. 1994; 154(23):2666-77. DOI: 10.1001/archinte.1994.00420230051007. View

2.
Puig-Barbera J, Belenguer Varea A, Goterris Pinto M, Brines Benlliure M . [Pneumococcal vaccine effectiveness in the elderly. Systematic review and meta-analysis]. Aten Primaria. 2002; 30(5):269-81; discussion 281-3. PMC: 7684164. DOI: 10.1016/s0212-6567(02)79027-6. View

3.
Go E, Ballas Z . Anti-pneumococcal antibody response in normal subjects: a meta-analysis. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 1996; 98(1):205-15. DOI: 10.1016/s0091-6749(96)70244-0. View

4.
Fedson D . Efficacy of polysaccharide pneumococcal vaccine in adults in more developed countries: another view of the evidence. Lancet Infect Dis. 2003; 3(5):272-3; discussion 273-4. DOI: 10.1016/s1473-3099(03)00604-2. View

5.
Davies E, Riddington C, Lottenberg R, Dower N . Pneumococcal vaccines for sickle cell disease. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2004; (1):CD003885. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD003885.pub2. View