» Articles » PMID: 19109950

Effects of Poly(2-hydroxyethyl Methacrylate) and Poly(vinyl-pyrrolidone) Hydrogel Implants on Myopic and Normal Chick Sclera

Overview
Journal Exp Eye Res
Specialty Ophthalmology
Date 2008 Dec 27
PMID 19109950
Citations 5
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

There has been generally little attention paid to the utilization of biomaterials as an anti-myopia treatment. The purpose of this study was to investigate whether polymeric hydrogels, either implanted or injected adjacent to the outer scleral surface, slow ocular elongation. White Leghorn (Gallus gallus domesticus) chicks were used at 2 weeks of age. Chicks had either (1) a strip of poly(2-hydroxyethyl methacrylate) (pHEMA) implanted monocularly against the outer sclera at the posterior pole, or (2) an in situ polymerizing gel [main ingredient: poly(vinyl-pyrrolidone) (PVP)] injected monocularly at the same location. Some of the eyes injected with the polymer were fitted with a diffuser or a -10D lens. In each experiment, ocular lengths were measured at regular intervals by high frequency A-scan ultrasonography, and chicks were sacrificed for histology at staged intervals. No in vivo signs of either orbital or ocular inflammation were observed. The pHEMA implant significantly increased scleral thickness by the third week, and the implant became encapsulated with fibrous tissue. The PVP-injected eyes left otherwise untreated, showed a significant increase in scleral thickness, due to increased chondrocyte proliferation and extracellular matrix deposition. However, there was no effect of the PVP injection on ocular elongation. In eyes wearing optical devices, there was no effect on either scleral thickness or ocular elongation. These results represent "proof of principle" that scleral growth can be manipulated without adverse inflammatory responses. However, since neither approach slowed ocular elongation, additional factors must influence scleral surface area expansion in the avian eye.

Citing Articles

Global trends and frontiers of research on pathologic myopia since the millennium: A bibliometric analysis.

Yang J, Wu S, Zhang C, Yu W, Dai R, Chen Y Front Public Health. 2022; 10:1047787.

PMID: 36561853 PMC: 9763585. DOI: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.1047787.


A Bioengineering Approach to Myopia Control Tested in a Guinea Pig Model.

Garcia M, Jha A, Healy K, Wildsoet C Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2017; 58(3):1875-1886.

PMID: 28358959 PMC: 5374882. DOI: 10.1167/iovs.16-20694.


The Effects of Scleral Collagen Cross-Linking Using Glyceraldehyde on the Progression of Form-Deprived Myopia in Guinea Pigs.

Chu Y, Cheng Z, Liu J, Wang Y, Guo H, Han Q J Ophthalmol. 2016; 2016:3526153.

PMID: 27504195 PMC: 4967684. DOI: 10.1155/2016/3526153.


Intact globe inflation testing of changes in scleral mechanics in myopia and recovery.

Lewis J, Garcia M, Rani L, Wildsoet C Exp Eye Res. 2014; 127:42-8.

PMID: 25041940 PMC: 4174731. DOI: 10.1016/j.exer.2014.07.004.


Scleral reinforcement through host tissue integration with biomimetic enzymatically degradable semi-interpenetrating polymer network.

Su J, Wall S, Healy K, Wildsoet C Tissue Eng Part A. 2009; 16(3):905-16.

PMID: 19814587 PMC: 2862610. DOI: 10.1089/ten.TEA.2009.0488.

References
1.
AVETISOV E, Savitskaya N, Vinetskaya M, Iomdina E . A study of biochemical and biomechanical qualities of normal and myopic eye sclera in humans of different age groups. Metab Pediatr Syst Ophthalmol. 1983; 7(4):183-8. View

2.
AVETISOV E, Tarutta E, Iomdina E, Vinetskaya M, Andreyeva L . Nonsurgical and surgical methods of sclera reinforcement in progressive myopia. Acta Ophthalmol Scand. 1998; 75(6):618-23. DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0420.1997.tb00617.x. View

3.
THOMPSON F . A simplified scleral reinforcement technique. Am J Ophthalmol. 1978; 86(6):782-90. DOI: 10.1016/0002-9394(78)90121-6. View

4.
Wollensak G, Spoerl E . Collagen crosslinking of human and porcine sclera. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2004; 30(3):689-95. DOI: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2003.11.032. View

5.
Kee C, Marzani D, Wallman J . Differences in time course and visual requirements of ocular responses to lenses and diffusers. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2001; 42(3):575-83. View