» Articles » PMID: 19103974

Schematic Knowledge Changes What Judgments of Learning Predict in a Source Memory Task

Overview
Journal Mem Cognit
Specialty Psychology
Date 2008 Dec 24
PMID 19103974
Citations 3
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Source monitoring can be influenced by information that is external to the study context, such as beliefs and general knowledge (Johnson, Hashtroudi, & Lindsay, 1993). We investigated the extent to which metamnemonic judgments predict memory for items and sources when schematic information about the sources is or is not provided at encoding. Participants made judgments of learning (JOLs) to statements presented by two speakers and were informed of the occupation of each speaker either before or after the encoding session. Replicating earlier work, prior knowledge decreased participants' tendency to erroneously attribute statements to schematically consistent but episodically incorrect speakers. The origin of this effect can be understood by examining the relationship between JOLs and performance: JOLs were equally predictive of item and source memory in the absence of prior knowledge, but were exclusively predictive of source memory when participants knew of the relationship between speakers and statements during study. Background knowledge determines the information that people solicit in service of metamnemonic judgments, suggesting that these judgments reflect control processes during encoding that reduce schematic errors.

Citing Articles

Predicting and remembering the behaviors of social targets: how prediction accuracy affects episodic memory.

Udeogu O, Frankenstein A, Sklenar A, Urban Levy P, Leshikar E BMC Psychol. 2022; 10(1):96.

PMID: 35397594 PMC: 8994913. DOI: 10.1186/s40359-022-00801-z.


Increasing control improves further control, but it does not enhance memory for the targets in a face-word Stroop task.

Jimenez L, Mendez C, Agra O, Ortiz-Tudela J Mem Cognit. 2020; 48(6):994-1006.

PMID: 32144648 PMC: 7381473. DOI: 10.3758/s13421-020-01028-2.


Executive Resources and Item-Context Binding: Exploring the Influence of Concurrent Inhibition, Updating, and Shifting Tasks on Context Memory.

Nieznanski M, Obidzinski M, Zyskowska E, Niedzialkowska D Adv Cogn Psychol. 2015; 11(3):106-17.

PMID: 26435761 PMC: 4591844. DOI: 10.5709/acp-0176-9.

References
1.
Koriat A, Bjork R, Sheffer L, Bar S . Predicting one's own forgetting: the role of experience-based and theory-based processes. J Exp Psychol Gen. 2004; 133(4):643-56. DOI: 10.1037/0096-3445.133.4.643. View

2.
Benjamin A, Bjork R . On the relationship between recognition speed and accuracy for words rehearsed via rote versus elaborative rehearsal. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2000; 26(3):638-48. DOI: 10.1037//0278-7393.26.3.638. View

3.
Bayen U, Nakamura G, Dupuis S, Yang C . The use of schematic knowledge about sources in source monitoring. Mem Cognit. 2000; 28(3):480-500. DOI: 10.3758/bf03198562. View

4.
Johnson M, Hashtroudi S, Lindsay D . Source monitoring. Psychol Bull. 1993; 114(1):3-28. DOI: 10.1037/0033-2909.114.1.3. View

5.
Benjamin A, Bjork R, Schwartz B . The mismeasure of memory: when retrieval fluency is misleading as a metamnemonic index. J Exp Psychol Gen. 1998; 127(1):55-68. DOI: 10.1037//0096-3445.127.1.55. View