» Articles » PMID: 19101773

Asking the Right Questions: Views on Genetic Variation Research Among Black and White Research Participants

Overview
Publisher Springer
Specialty General Medicine
Date 2008 Dec 23
PMID 19101773
Citations 15
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Genetic variation research (GVR) may raise concerns about misuse of information and discrimination. Seemingly contradictory positive views about GVR have also been reported.

Objective: To dissect this inconsistency, our objectives were to: (1) explore open-ended views of GVR and (2) quantify views of and willingness to participate in GVR by race.

Design: Cross-sectional study.

Participants: 801 African-American and white prior participants in a case-control genetic epidemiology study of colon cancer risks (NCCCS).

Measures: Qualitative measures evaluated responses to questions about good and bad things about GVR. Quantitative measures evaluated positive and negative perceptions, perceptions of discrimination, and likelihood of future participation by race.

Results: Open-ended queries about GVR resulted in few "negative" responses. In closed-ended questions, however, African Americans were more likely to feel that such research would: result in higher insurance (41% vs. 30%, p = 0.008), not benefit minorities (29% vs. 14%, p=<0.001), reinforce racism (32% vs. 20%, p = 0.002), and use minorities as guinea pigs (27% vs. 6%, p < 0.001). Overall, after adjustment for potential confounding factors, African-American race remained inversely associated with feeling "very positive" about GVR (46% vs. 57%, p = 0.035). In contrast, African Americans were as likely as whites to express willingness to participate in future GVR studies (46%).

Conclusions: Open-ended questions about GVR were unlikely to spontaneously generate "negative" responses. In contrast, when presented specific examples of potentially negative implications, more respondents agreed, and minorities were more likely to express concerns. This suggests that while participants appear generally positive about GVR, their inability to articulate views regarding these complex concepts may require that researchers engage lay audiences, ensure accurate understanding, and provide them with language to express concerns.

Citing Articles

Understanding inequities in precision oncology diagnostics.

Dutta R, Vallurupalli M, McVeigh Q, Huang F, Rebbeck T Nat Cancer. 2023; 4(6):787-794.

PMID: 37248397 DOI: 10.1038/s43018-023-00568-1.


Promoting Inclusive Recruitment: a Qualitative Study of Black Adults' Decision to Participate in Genetic Research.

Connor J, Kyalwazi A, Turkson-Ocran R, Olveczky D J Urban Health. 2022; 99(5):803-812.

PMID: 35879487 PMC: 9312310. DOI: 10.1007/s11524-022-00664-0.


Factors associated with willingness to provide biospecimens for genetics research among African American cancer survivors.

Ewing A, Kalu N, Cain G, Erby L, Ricks-Santi L, Tetteyfio-Kidd Telemaque E J Community Genet. 2019; 10(4):471-480.

PMID: 30877487 PMC: 6754482. DOI: 10.1007/s12687-019-00411-0.


Factors associated with participation by African Americans in a study of the genetics of glaucoma.

Parikh R, OKeefe L, Salowe R, McCoskey M, Pan W, Sankar P Ethn Health. 2017; 24(6):694-704.

PMID: 28669230 PMC: 5748378. DOI: 10.1080/13557858.2017.1346189.


Conducting Precision Medicine Research with African Americans.

Halbert C, McDonald J, Vadaparampil S, Rice L, Jefferson M PLoS One. 2016; 11(7):e0154850.

PMID: 27441706 PMC: 4956119. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0154850.


References
1.
Bloche M . Race-based therapeutics. N Engl J Med. 2004; 351(20):2035-7. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMp048271. View

2.
Bates B, Lynch J, Bevan J, Condit C . Warranted concerns, warranted outlooks: a focus group study of public understandings of genetic research. Soc Sci Med. 2004; 60(2):331-44. DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2004.05.012. View

3.
Condit C, Parrott R, Bates B, Bevan J, Achter P . Exploration of the impact of messages about genes and race on lay attitudes. Clin Genet. 2004; 66(5):402-8. DOI: 10.1111/j.1399-0004.2004.00327.x. View

4.
Dickson D . Public views genetic research cautiously. Nat Med. 2002; 7(4):391. DOI: 10.1038/86434. View

5.
Lassen J, Jamison A . Genetic technologies meet the public: the discourses of concern. Sci Technol Human Values. 2006; 31(1):8-28. DOI: 10.1177/0162243905280021. View