A Comparison of Modified Larson and 'anatomic' Posterolateral Corner Reconstructions in Knees with Combined PCL and Posterolateral Corner Deficiency

Different methods to reconstruct damaged posterolateral structures are available, but there has been little work studying their relative performance in combined PCL plus posterolateral corner (PLC) deficiency. We hypothesized that an 'anatomic' reconstruction with three graft bundles crossing the joint line would restore knee laxity closer to normal than a modified two-bundle Larson reconstruction. In a controlled laboratory study, the kinematics of cadaveric knees were measured electromagnetically with posterior drawer, external rotation, or varus rotation loads applied, with the knee at sequential stages: intact, PCL-deficient; PCL plus PLC-deficient; modified Larson reconstruction; anatomic PLC reconstruction. The graft bundles were tensioned sequentially to restore specific degrees of freedom to intact values of laxity at specific angles of knee flexion. A significant difference was not found between the two reconstructions. Both reconstructions restored external rotation and varus laxity to normal. Both restored posterior drawer to that caused by isolated PCL deficiency, but did not restore posterior laxity to normal. It was concluded that, with appropriate graft tensioning, both PLC reconstructions could restore both external rotation and varus laxity to normal, but not posterior drawer. The three-stranded anatomical reconstruction did not perform better than the modified two-strand Larson technique. Both of these isolated PLC reconstructions in knees with combined PCL plus PLC deficiency restored the knees to the laxity condition of an isolated PCL-deficiency, they could not reduce posterior drawer to normal.