» Articles » PMID: 19092994

UP States Protect Ongoing Cortical Activity from Thalamic Inputs

Overview
Journal PLoS One
Date 2008 Dec 19
PMID 19092994
Citations 35
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Cortical neurons in vitro and in vivo fluctuate spontaneously between two stable membrane potentials: a depolarized UP state and a hyperpolarized DOWN state. UP states temporally correspond with multineuronal firing sequences which may be important for information processing. To examine how thalamic inputs interact with ongoing cortical UP state activity, we used calcium imaging and targeted whole-cell recordings of activated neurons in thalamocortical slices of mouse somatosensory cortex. Whereas thalamic stimulation during DOWN states generated multineuronal, synchronized UP states, identical stimulation during UP states had no effect on the subthreshold membrane dynamics of the vast majority of cells or on ongoing multineuronal temporal patterns. Both thalamocortical and corticocortical PSPs were significantly reduced and neuronal input resistance was significantly decreased during cortical UP states -- mechanistically consistent with UP state insensitivity. Our results demonstrate that cortical dynamics during UP states are insensitive to thalamic inputs.

Citing Articles

A layered microcircuit model of somatosensory cortex with three interneuron types and cell-type-specific short-term plasticity.

Jiang H, Qi G, Duarte R, Feldmeyer D, van Albada S Cereb Cortex. 2024; 34(9.

PMID: 39344196 PMC: 11439972. DOI: 10.1093/cercor/bhae378.


Neuronal ensembles: Building blocks of neural circuits.

Yuste R, Cossart R, Yaksi E Neuron. 2024; 112(6):875-892.

PMID: 38262413 PMC: 10957317. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuron.2023.12.008.


The impact of the human thalamus on brain-wide information processing.

Shine J, Lewis L, Garrett D, Hwang K Nat Rev Neurosci. 2023; 24(7):416-430.

PMID: 37237103 PMC: 10970713. DOI: 10.1038/s41583-023-00701-0.


Patterned activation of action potential patterns during offline states in the neocortex: replay and non-replay.

Liu T, Watson B Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2020; 375(1799):20190233.

PMID: 32248782 PMC: 7209911. DOI: 10.1098/rstb.2019.0233.


A novel mutual information estimator to measure spike train correlations in a model thalamocortical network.

Gribkova E, Ibrahim B, Llano D J Neurophysiol. 2018; 120(6):2730-2744.

PMID: 30183459 PMC: 6337027. DOI: 10.1152/jn.00012.2018.


References
1.
Kali S, Dayan P . Off-line replay maintains declarative memories in a model of hippocampal-neocortical interactions. Nat Neurosci. 2004; 7(3):286-94. DOI: 10.1038/nn1202. View

2.
Beierlein M, Fall C, Rinzel J, Yuste R . Thalamocortical bursts trigger recurrent activity in neocortical networks: layer 4 as a frequency-dependent gate. J Neurosci. 2002; 22(22):9885-94. PMC: 6757840. View

3.
Agmon A, Connors B . Thalamocortical responses of mouse somatosensory (barrel) cortex in vitro. Neuroscience. 1991; 41(2-3):365-79. DOI: 10.1016/0306-4522(91)90333-j. View

4.
Ikegaya Y, Aaron G, Cossart R, Aronov D, Lampl I, Ferster D . Synfire chains and cortical songs: temporal modules of cortical activity. Science. 2004; 304(5670):559-64. DOI: 10.1126/science.1093173. View

5.
Bruno R, Sakmann B . Cortex is driven by weak but synchronously active thalamocortical synapses. Science. 2006; 312(5780):1622-7. DOI: 10.1126/science.1124593. View