» Articles » PMID: 19088599

Simulation-based Medical Education: an Ethical Imperative

Overview
Journal Simul Healthc
Specialty Health Services
Date 2008 Dec 18
PMID 19088599
Citations 44
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Medical training must at some point use live patients to hone the skills of health professionals. But there is also an obligation to provide optimal treatment and to ensure patients' safety and well-being. Balancing these 2 needs represents a fundamental ethical tension in medical education. Simulation-based learning can help mitigate this tension by developing health professionals' knowledge, skills, and attitudes while protecting patients from unnecessary risk. Simulation-based training has been institutionalized in other high-hazard professions, such as aviation, nuclear power, and the military, to maximize training safety and minimize risk. Health care has lagged behind in simulation applications for a number of reasons, including cost, lack of rigorous proof of effect, and resistance to change. Recently, the international patient safety movement and the U.S. federal policy agenda have created a receptive atmosphere for expanding the use of simulators in medical training, stressing the ethical imperative to "first do no harm" in the face of validated, large epidemiological studies describing unacceptable preventable injuries to patients as a result of medical management. Four themes provide a framework for an ethical analysis of simulation-based medical education: best standards of care and training, error management and patient safety, patient autonomy, and social justice and resource allocation. These themes are examined from the perspectives of patients, learners, educators, and society. The use of simulation wherever feasible conveys a critical educational and ethical message to all: patients are to be protected whenever possible and they are not commodities to be used as conveniences of training.

Citing Articles

Enhancing student nurses' ethical skills via simulation-based learning: barriers and opportunities.

Rasesemola R, Molabe M BMC Nurs. 2025; 24(1):147.

PMID: 39920632 PMC: 11806624. DOI: 10.1186/s12912-025-02742-5.


Current status of ultrasound training in obstetrics and gynecology: a scoping literature review.

Matschl J, Jimenez-Cruz J, Schafer V, Wittek A, Berg C, Geipel A Front Med (Lausanne). 2024; 11:1426484.

PMID: 39600933 PMC: 11588472. DOI: 10.3389/fmed.2024.1426484.


A novel interventional pain simulation-based education curriculum: Implementation to enhance procedural training.

Sarno D, Yong R, Fields K, Lim S, Gilligan C, Khan L Interv Pain Med. 2024; 1(4):100167.

PMID: 39238865 PMC: 11373074. DOI: 10.1016/j.inpm.2022.100167.


.

Mokaddem S, Baati R, Belaid I, Zouiten L, Ben Mansour A Tunis Med. 2024; 102(6):326-330.

PMID: 38864194 PMC: 11358807. DOI: 10.62438/tunismed.v102i6.4362.


Innovations to Improve Lung Isolation Training for Thoracic Anesthesia: A Narrative Review.

Grandjean C, Casso G, Noirez L, Gil M, Savoldelli G, Schoettker P J Clin Med. 2024; 13(7).

PMID: 38610613 PMC: 11012997. DOI: 10.3390/jcm13071848.