» Articles » PMID: 19084990

Is Routine MR Cholangiopancreatography (MRCP) Justified Prior to Cholecystectomy?

Overview
Specialty General Surgery
Date 2008 Dec 17
PMID 19084990
Citations 17
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Purpose: We investigated routinely the bile ducts by magnetic resonance cholangiopancreaticography (MRCP) prior to cholecystectomy. The aim of this study was to analyze the rate of clinically inapparent common bile duct (CBD) stones, the predictive value of elevated liver enzymes for CBD stones, and the influence of the radiological results on the perioperative management.

Methods: In this prospective study, 465 patients were cholecystectomized within 18 months, mainly laparoscopically. Preoperative MRCP was performed in 454 patients.

Results: With MRCP screening, clinically silent CBD stones were found in 4%. Elevated liver enzymes have only a poor predictive value for the presence of CBD stones (positive predictive value, 21%; negative predictive value, 96%). Compared to the recent literature, the postoperative morbidity in this study was low (0 bile duct injury, 0.4% residual gallstones).

Conclusions: Although MRCP is diagnostically useful in the perioperative management in some cases, its routine use in the DRG-era may not be justified due to the costs.

Citing Articles

Pilot feasibility study to determine the utility of direct access and quantitative magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography (MRCP) in the assessment of suspected acute biliary or ductal gallstone presentations.

Novak A, Acharya A, Beer S, Espinosa A, Smith G, Saga C BMC Gastroenterol. 2025; 25(1):72.

PMID: 39930378 PMC: 11809031. DOI: 10.1186/s12876-025-03637-0.


The significance of isolated hyperbilirubinemia in detecting asymptomatic common bile duct stones in patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Aljorfi A, Abdelkarim M, Elaraby M, Kotb A, Morgan R Surg Pract Sci. 2025; 15():100223.

PMID: 39844805 PMC: 11749414. DOI: 10.1016/j.sipas.2023.100223.


Evaluation of the Common bile duct (CBD) Diameter After Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy (LC) and Laparoscopic Common Bile Duct Exploration (LCBDE): A Retrospective Study.

Pallaneeandee N, Govindan S, Zi Jun L Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2023; 33(1):62-68.

PMID: 36630657 PMC: 9889197. DOI: 10.1097/SLE.0000000000001135.


Routine preoperative MRCP in screening choledocholithiasis in acute cholecystitis compared to selective approach: a population-based study.

Mattila A, Pynnonen E, Sironen A, Elomaa E, Mrena J, Jalkanen A Updates Surg. 2022; 75(3):563-570.

PMID: 36207660 DOI: 10.1007/s13304-022-01390-7.


Magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography enhanced by virtual reality as a novel tool to improve the understanding of biliary anatomy and the teaching of surgical trainees.

Staubli S, Maloca P, Kuemmerli C, Kunz J, Dirnberger A, Allemann A Front Surg. 2022; 9:916443.

PMID: 36034383 PMC: 9411984. DOI: 10.3389/fsurg.2022.916443.


References
1.
Laokpessi A, Bouillet P, Sautereau D, Cessot F, Desport J, Le Sidaner A . Value of magnetic resonance cholangiography in the preoperative diagnosis of common bile duct stones. Am J Gastroenterol. 2001; 96(8):2354-9. DOI: 10.1111/j.1572-0241.2001.04045.x. View

2.
. Diagnosis and treatment of common bile duct stones (CBDS). Results of a consensus development conference. Surg Endosc. 1998; 12(6):856-64. View

3.
Pavone P, Laghi A, Lomanto D, Fiocca F, Panebianco V, Catalano C . MR cholangiography (MRC) in the evaluation of CBD stones before laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Surg Endosc. 1997; 11(10):982-5. DOI: 10.1007/s004649900507. View

4.
Ke Z, Zheng C, Li J, Yin K, Hua J . Prospective evaluation of magnetic resonance cholangiography in patients with suspected common bile duct stones before laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Hepatobiliary Pancreat Dis Int. 2003; 2(4):576-80. View

5.
BOSE S, Mazumdar A, Prakash V, Kocher R, Katariya S, Pathak C . Evaluation of the predictors of choledocholithiasis: comparative analysis of clinical, biochemical, radiological, radionuclear, and intraoperative parameters. Surg Today. 2001; 31(2):117-22. DOI: 10.1007/s005950170194. View