» Articles » PMID: 19081734

Differences in Lower-extremity Muscular Activation During Walking Between Healthy Older and Young Adults

Overview
Publisher Elsevier
Specialty Physiology
Date 2008 Dec 17
PMID 19081734
Citations 86
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Previous studies have identified differences in gait kinetics between healthy older and young adults. However, the underlying factors that cause these changes are not well understood. The objective of this study was to assess the effects of age and speed on the activation of lower-extremity muscles during human walking. We recorded electromyography (EMG) signals of the soleus, gastrocnemius, biceps femoris, medial hamstrings, tibialis anterior, vastus lateralis, and rectus femoris as healthy young and older adults walked over ground at slow, preferred and fast walking speeds. Nineteen healthy older adults (age, 73+/-5 years) and 18 healthy young adults (age, 26+/-3 years) participated. Rectified EMG signals were normalized to mean activities over a gait cycle at the preferred speed, allowing for an assessment of how the activity was distributed over the gait cycle and modulated with speed. Compared to the young adults, the older adults exhibited greater activation of the tibialis anterior and soleus during mid-stance at all walking speeds and greater activation of the vastus lateralis and medial hamstrings during loading and mid-stance at the fast walking speed, suggesting increased coactivation across the ankle and knee. In addition, older adults depend less on soleus muscle activation to push off at faster walking speeds. We conclude that age-related changes in neuromuscular activity reflect a strategy of stiffening the limb during single support and likely contribute to reduced push off power at fast walking speeds.

Citing Articles

Gender Differences in Joint Biomechanics During Obstacle Crossing with Different Heights.

Wang C, Guo Y, Du W, Li Z, Chen W Bioengineering (Basel). 2025; 12(2).

PMID: 40001708 PMC: 11851498. DOI: 10.3390/bioengineering12020189.


Increased Variability in Lower Limb Muscle Activation Is Observed with Increasing Walking Speed in Fall-Risk Older Adults.

Park Y, Bae Y Life (Basel). 2025; 14(12.

PMID: 39768259 PMC: 11676664. DOI: 10.3390/life14121551.


Longitudinal analysis of lower limb muscle activity and ankle tendon biosignals using structural equation modeling.

Matsumoto T, Kano Y Eur J Transl Myol. 2024; 34(4.

PMID: 39503285 PMC: 11726298. DOI: 10.4081/ejtm.2024.12701.


Effect of Programed Walking Exercise Using Bot Fit in Younger Adults.

Lee S, Kim E, Kim J, Kim D, Lee D, Lee H Sports Med Open. 2024; 10(1):112.

PMID: 39400778 PMC: 11473468. DOI: 10.1186/s40798-024-00773-x.


Effects of static exercises on hip muscle fatigue and knee wobble assessed by surface electromyography and inertial measurement unit data.

Dyer O, Seeley M, Wheatley B Sci Rep. 2024; 14(1):10448.

PMID: 38714802 PMC: 11076610. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-61325-7.


References
1.
Stewart C, Postans N, Schwartz M, Rozumalski A, Roberts A . An exploration of the function of the triceps surae during normal gait using functional electrical stimulation. Gait Posture. 2007; 26(4):482-8. DOI: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2006.12.001. View

2.
McGibbon C, Krebs D . Discriminating age and disability effects in locomotion: neuromuscular adaptations in musculoskeletal pathology. J Appl Physiol (1985). 2003; 96(1):149-60. DOI: 10.1152/japplphysiol.00422.2003. View

3.
Stewart A, Mills K, King A, Haskell W, Gillis D, Ritter P . CHAMPS physical activity questionnaire for older adults: outcomes for interventions. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2001; 33(7):1126-41. DOI: 10.1097/00005768-200107000-00010. View

4.
Manchester D, Woollacott M, Marin O . Visual, vestibular and somatosensory contributions to balance control in the older adult. J Gerontol. 1989; 44(4):M118-27. DOI: 10.1093/geronj/44.4.m118. View

5.
Cappozzo A, Catani F, Croce U, Leardini A . Position and orientation in space of bones during movement: anatomical frame definition and determination. Clin Biomech (Bristol). 1995; 10(4):171-178. DOI: 10.1016/0268-0033(95)91394-t. View