» Articles » PMID: 19076397

Two Forms of Implicit Learning in Young Adults with Dyslexia

Overview
Specialty Science
Date 2008 Dec 17
PMID 19076397
Citations 14
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Implicit learning is thought to underlie the acquisition of many skills including reading. Previous research has shown that some forms of implicit learning are reduced in individuals with dyslexia (e.g., sequence learning), whereas other forms are spared (e.g., spatial context learning). However, it has been proposed that dyslexia-related motor dysfunction may have contributed to the implicit sequence learning deficits reported earlier. To assess implicit sequence learning in the absence of a motor sequence, 16 young adults diagnosed with dyslexia (20.6 +/- 1.5 years) and 18 healthy controls (20.8 +/- 2.0 years) completed a triplet frequency learning task (TRIP) that involved learning a sequential regularity in which the location of certain events followed a repeating pattern, but motor responses did not. Participants also completed the spatial contextual cueing task (SCCT), which involved learning a spatial regularity in which the location of distractors in some visual arrays predicted the target location. In addition, neuropsychological tests of real-word and pseudo-word reading were administered. TRIP task analyses revealed no between-group differences in pattern learning, but a positive correlation between individual learning scores and reading ability indicated that poor readers learned less well than did good readers. Thus, earlier reports of reduced implicit sequence learning in dyslexics cannot be entirely accounted for by motor sequencing deficits. No significant correlations or group differences in learning were found for SCCT. These findings offer additional evidence for a link between poor reading and impaired implicit sequence learning.

Citing Articles

Feedback timing-modulated weather prediction reveals relative deficits in both procedural and declarative learning in adults with dyslexia.

Thimmugari R, Sacko C, Earle F Dyslexia. 2024; 30(3):e1780.

PMID: 39030983 PMC: 11317971. DOI: 10.1002/dys.1780.


Statistical learning in children with a family risk of dyslexia.

de Bree E, Verhagen J Dyslexia. 2022; 28(2):185-201.

PMID: 35289019 PMC: 9314089. DOI: 10.1002/dys.1711.


Is there more room to improve? The lifespan trajectory of procedural learning and its relationship to the between- and within-group differences in average response times.

Juhasz D, Nemeth D, Janacsek K PLoS One. 2019; 14(7):e0215116.

PMID: 31314804 PMC: 6636713. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0215116.


Atypical predictive processing during visual statistical learning in children with developmental dyslexia: an event-related potential study.

Singh S, Walk A, Conway C Ann Dyslexia. 2018; 68(2):165-179.

PMID: 29907920 PMC: 6390967. DOI: 10.1007/s11881-018-0161-2.


The procedural learning deficit hypothesis of language learning disorders: we see some problems.

West G, Vadillo M, Shanks D, Hulme C Dev Sci. 2017; 21(2).

PMID: 28256101 PMC: 5888158. DOI: 10.1111/desc.12552.


References
1.
HOWARD Jr J, Howard D . Age differences in implicit learning of higher order dependencies in serial patterns. Psychol Aging. 1998; 12(4):634-56. DOI: 10.1037//0882-7974.12.4.634. View

2.
Pothos E, Kirk J . Investigating learning deficits associated with dyslexia. Dyslexia. 2004; 10(1):61-76. DOI: 10.1002/dys.266. View

3.
Russeler J, Gerth I, Munte T . Implicit learning is intact in adult developmental dyslexic readers: evidence from the serial reaction time task and artificial grammar learning. J Clin Exp Neuropsychol. 2006; 28(5):808-27. DOI: 10.1080/13803390591001007. View

4.
Seger C . Two forms of sequential implicit learning. Conscious Cogn. 1997; 6(1):108-31. DOI: 10.1006/ccog.1996.0285. View

5.
Nicolson R, Fawcett A, BERRY E, Jenkins I, Dean P, Brooks D . Association of abnormal cerebellar activation with motor learning difficulties in dyslexic adults. Lancet. 1999; 353(9165):1662-7. DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(98)09165-X. View