» Articles » PMID: 19074232

Randomised Controlled Trial of Alexander Technique Lessons, Exercise, and Massage (ATEAM) for Chronic and Recurrent Back Pain: Economic Evaluation

Overview
Journal BMJ
Specialty General Medicine
Date 2008 Dec 17
PMID 19074232
Citations 25
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objective: An economic evaluation of therapeutic massage, exercise, and lessons in the Alexander technique for treating persistent back pain.

Design: Cost consequences study and cost effectiveness analysis at 12 month follow-up of a factorial randomised controlled trial.

Participants: 579 patients with chronic or recurrent low back pain recruited from primary care.

Interventions: Normal care (control), massage, and six or 24 lessons in the Alexander technique. Half of each group were randomised to a prescription for exercise from a doctor plus behavioural counselling from a nurse.

Main Outcome Measures: Costs to the NHS and to participants. Comparison of costs with Roland-Morris disability score (number of activities impaired by pain), days in pain, and quality adjusted life years (QALYs). Comparison of NHS costs with QALY gain, using incremental cost effectiveness ratios and cost effectiveness acceptability curves.

Results: Intervention costs ranged from pound30 for exercise prescription to pound596 for 24 lessons in Alexander technique plus exercise. Cost of health services ranged from pound50 for 24 lessons in Alexander technique to pound124 for exercise. Incremental cost effectiveness analysis of single therapies showed that exercise offered best value ( pound61 per point on disability score, pound9 per additional pain-free day, pound2847 per QALY gain). For two-stage therapy, six lessons in Alexander technique combined with exercise was the best value (additional pound64 per point on disability score, pound43 per additional pain-free day, pound5332 per QALY gain).

Conclusions: An exercise prescription and six lessons in Alexander technique alone were both more than 85% likely to be cost effective at values above pound20 000 per QALY, but the Alexander technique performed better than exercise on the full range of outcomes. A combination of six lessons in Alexander technique lessons followed by exercise was the most effective and cost effective option.

Citing Articles

Effects of the Alexander technique on pain and adverse events in chronic non-specific neck pain: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Qin D, Qin Y, Wang Y, Xue L, Peng Y PLoS One. 2024; 19(11):e0313526.

PMID: 39576801 PMC: 11584109. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0313526.


Which interactions matter in economic evaluations? A systematic review and simulation study.

Dakin H, Gray A BMC Med Res Methodol. 2020; 20(1):109.

PMID: 32380948 PMC: 7203889. DOI: 10.1186/s12874-020-00978-0.


Stratified primary care versus non-stratified care for musculoskeletal pain: findings from the STarT MSK feasibility and pilot cluster randomized controlled trial.

Hill J, Garvin S, Chen Y, Cooper V, Wathall S, Saunders B BMC Fam Pract. 2020; 21(1):30.

PMID: 32046647 PMC: 7014664. DOI: 10.1186/s12875-019-1074-9.


Costing Methodology and Key Drivers of Health Care Costs Within Economic Analyses in Musculoskeletal Community and Primary Care Services: A Systematic Review of the Literature.

Burgess R, Hall J, Bishop A, Lewis M, Hill J J Prim Care Community Health. 2020; 11:2150132719899763.

PMID: 31941391 PMC: 6966248. DOI: 10.1177/2150132719899763.


Cost-Effectiveness of a Team-Based Integrative Medicine Approach to the Treatment of Back Pain.

Wayne P, Buring J, Eisenberg D, Osypiuk K, Gow B, Davis R J Altern Complement Med. 2019; 25(S1):S138-S146.

PMID: 30870015 PMC: 6444892. DOI: 10.1089/acm.2018.0503.


References
1.
. United Kingdom back pain exercise and manipulation (UK BEAM) randomised trial: cost effectiveness of physical treatments for back pain in primary care. BMJ. 2004; 329(7479):1381. PMC: 535455. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.38282.607859.AE. View

2.
Von Korff M, Ormel J, Keefe F, Dworkin S . Grading the severity of chronic pain. Pain. 1992; 50(2):133-149. DOI: 10.1016/0304-3959(92)90154-4. View

3.
Ratcliffe J, Thomas K, MacPherson H, Brazier J . A randomised controlled trial of acupuncture care for persistent low back pain: cost effectiveness analysis. BMJ. 2006; 333(7569):626. PMC: 1570795. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.38932.806134.7C. View

4.
Moffett J, Torgerson D, Jackson D, Farrin A, Barber J . Randomised controlled trial of exercise for low back pain: clinical outcomes, costs, and preferences. BMJ. 1999; 319(7205):279-83. PMC: 28176. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.319.7205.279. View

5.
Briggs A, Clark T, Wolstenholme J, Clarke P . Missing... presumed at random: cost-analysis of incomplete data. Health Econ. 2003; 12(5):377-92. DOI: 10.1002/hec.766. View