» Articles » PMID: 19072724

Where Wnts Went: the Exploding Field of Lrp5 and Lrp6 Signaling in Bone

Overview
Date 2008 Dec 17
PMID 19072724
Citations 98
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Wnt signaling has emerged as a central regulator of skeletal modeling and remodeling. Loss- or gain-of-function mutations in two Wnt co-receptors, Lrp5 and (more recently) Lrp6, have drawn attention to the importance of the Wnt pathway in bone biology. This review summarizes our current understanding of how the Wnt pathway operates on bone and the implications this has for skeletal physiology and drug discovery. Over the past 9 yr, rapid advances have been made in our understanding of the cellular targets for Wnt signaling and of the important regulatory molecules in this metabolic pathway. Both canonical and noncanonical signaling pathways seem to be important for mediating the effects of Wnt in bone. A rapidly expanding catalog of genetically engineered mice has been used to establish the importance of downstream effector molecules (such as beta-catenin) in the Wnt pathway, as well as the critical role of endogenous inhibitors of Wnt signaling (such as Dkk1 and sclerostin) in bone metabolism. Indeed, regulation of sclerostin in osteocytes is emerging as an important final pathway for regulating bone anabolism in response to diverse trophic stimuli, from mechnotransduction to the anabolic actions of PTH. From the outset, it had been assumed that the effects of Wnt signaling in bone were caused by direct actions in osteoblast precursors, osteoblasts, and osteocytes. However, startling recent findings have challenged this view and suggest that a key target, at least in mice, is the duodenal enterochromaffin cell. There, Wnt signaling transduced by Lrp5 regulates serotonin synthesis, which acts in an endocrine fashion to regulate bone cell metabolism. It will take time to reconcile this new information with the considerable body of information we already have regarding the actions of Wnt in bone. The Wnt pathway has rapidly emerged as a therapeutic target for drug discovery. Neutralizing antibodies and small-molecule inhibitors of endogenous Wnt inhibitors have shown early promise as bone anabolic agents. However, given the central role of the Wnt pathway in regulating growth and development in extraskeletal tissues, as well as our still rudimentary understanding of how this signaling cascade actually affects bone metabolism, considerable work will be needed to ensure the safety of these new therapies.

Citing Articles

Regulatory cellular and molecular networks in the bone microenvironment during aging.

Zhang L, Wang Z, Zhang Y, Ji R, Li Z, Zou J Life Med. 2025; 3(3):lnae019.

PMID: 39871887 PMC: 11749081. DOI: 10.1093/lifemedi/lnae019.


Multiscale and multidisciplinary analysis of aging processes in bone.

Ravazzano L, Colaianni G, Tarakanova A, Xiao Y, Grano M, Libonati F NPJ Aging. 2024; 10(1):28.

PMID: 38879533 PMC: 11180112. DOI: 10.1038/s41514-024-00156-2.


ATP6AP2, a regulator of LRP6/β-catenin protein trafficking, promotes Wnt/β-catenin signaling and bone formation in a cell type dependent manner.

Xiong L, Guo H, Pan J, Ren X, Lee D, Chen L Bone Res. 2024; 12(1):33.

PMID: 38811544 PMC: 11137048. DOI: 10.1038/s41413-024-00335-7.


LRP5, Bone Mass Polymorphisms and Skeletal Disorders.

Littman J, Yang W, Olansen J, Phornphutkul C, Aaron R Genes (Basel). 2023; 14(10).

PMID: 37895195 PMC: 10606254. DOI: 10.3390/genes14101846.


Lipocalin 2 receptors: facts, fictions, and myths.

Schroder S, Gasterich N, Weiskirchen S, Weiskirchen R Front Immunol. 2023; 14:1229885.

PMID: 37638032 PMC: 10451079. DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2023.1229885.


References
1.
Bhat B, Allen K, Liu W, Graham J, Morales A, Anisowicz A . Structure-based mutation analysis shows the importance of LRP5 beta-propeller 1 in modulating Dkk1-mediated inhibition of Wnt signaling. Gene. 2007; 391(1-2):103-12. DOI: 10.1016/j.gene.2006.12.014. View

2.
Lindvall C, Bu W, Williams B, Li Y . Wnt signaling, stem cells, and the cellular origin of breast cancer. Stem Cell Rev. 2007; 3(2):157-68. DOI: 10.1007/s12015-007-0025-3. View

3.
van Meurs J, Trikalinos T, Ralston S, Balcells S, Brandi M, Brixen K . Large-scale analysis of association between LRP5 and LRP6 variants and osteoporosis. JAMA. 2008; 299(11):1277-90. PMC: 3282142. DOI: 10.1001/jama.299.11.1277. View

4.
OBrien C, Plotkin L, Galli C, Goellner J, Gortazar A, Allen M . Control of bone mass and remodeling by PTH receptor signaling in osteocytes. PLoS One. 2008; 3(8):e2942. PMC: 2491588. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0002942. View

5.
Little R, Carulli J, Mastro R, Dupuis J, Osborne M, Folz C . A mutation in the LDL receptor-related protein 5 gene results in the autosomal dominant high-bone-mass trait. Am J Hum Genet. 2001; 70(1):11-9. PMC: 419982. DOI: 10.1086/338450. View