» Articles » PMID: 19036985

Decoding Trajectories from Posterior Parietal Cortex Ensembles

Overview
Journal J Neurosci
Specialty Neurology
Date 2008 Nov 28
PMID 19036985
Citations 87
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

High-level cognitive signals in the posterior parietal cortex (PPC) have previously been used to decode the intended endpoint of a reach, providing the first evidence that PPC can be used for direct control of a neural prosthesis (Musallam et al., 2004). Here we expand on this work by showing that PPC neural activity can be harnessed to estimate not only the endpoint but also to continuously control the trajectory of an end effector. Specifically, we trained two monkeys to use a joystick to guide a cursor on a computer screen to peripheral target locations while maintaining central ocular fixation. We found that we could accurately reconstruct the trajectory of the cursor using a relatively small ensemble of simultaneously recorded PPC neurons. Using a goal-based Kalman filter that incorporates target information into the state-space, we showed that the decoded estimate of cursor position could be significantly improved. Finally, we tested whether we could decode trajectories during closed-loop brain control sessions, in which the real-time position of the cursor was determined solely by a monkey's neural activity in PPC. The monkey learned to perform brain control trajectories at 80% success rate (for 8 targets) after just 4-5 sessions. This improvement in behavioral performance was accompanied by a corresponding enhancement in neural tuning properties (i.e., increased tuning depth and coverage of encoding parameter space) as well as an increase in off-line decoding performance of the PPC ensemble.

Citing Articles

Enhanced control of a brain-computer interface by tetraplegic participants via neural-network-mediated feature extraction.

Haghi B, Aflalo T, Kellis S, Guan C, Gamez de Leon J, Huang A Nat Biomed Eng. 2024; .

PMID: 39643728 DOI: 10.1038/s41551-024-01297-1.


Decoding the brain: From neural representations to mechanistic models.

Mathis M, Perez Rotondo A, Chang E, Tolias A, Mathis A Cell. 2024; 187(21):5814-5832.

PMID: 39423801 PMC: 11637322. DOI: 10.1016/j.cell.2024.08.051.


Similar neural states, but dissimilar decoding patterns for motor control in parietal cortex.

Vaccari F, Diomedi S, De Vitis M, Filippini M, Fattori P Netw Neurosci. 2024; 8(2):486-516.

PMID: 38952818 PMC: 11146678. DOI: 10.1162/netn_a_00364.


Prediction error in implicit adaptation during visually- and memory-guided reaching tasks.

Numasawa K, Miyamoto T, Kizuka T, Ono S Sci Rep. 2024; 14(1):8582.

PMID: 38615053 PMC: 11016115. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-59169-2.


Towards unlocking motor control in spinal cord injured by applying an online EEG-based framework to decode motor intention, trajectory and error processing.

Mondini V, Sburlea A, Muller-Putz G Sci Rep. 2024; 14(1):4714.

PMID: 38413782 PMC: 10899181. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-55413-x.


References
1.
Quian Quiroga R, Snyder L, Batista A, Cui H, Andersen R . Movement intention is better predicted than attention in the posterior parietal cortex. J Neurosci. 2006; 26(13):3615-20. PMC: 6673863. DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3468-05.2006. View

2.
SNYDER L, Batista A, Andersen R . Coding of intention in the posterior parietal cortex. Nature. 1997; 386(6621):167-70. DOI: 10.1038/386167a0. View

3.
Andersen R, Buneo C . Intentional maps in posterior parietal cortex. Annu Rev Neurosci. 2002; 25:189-220. DOI: 10.1146/annurev.neuro.25.112701.142922. View

4.
Buneo C, Jarvis M, Batista A, Andersen R . Direct visuomotor transformations for reaching. Nature. 2002; 416(6881):632-6. DOI: 10.1038/416632a. View

5.
Wolpert D, Miall R . Forward Models for Physiological Motor Control. Neural Netw. 1996; 9(8):1265-1279. DOI: 10.1016/s0893-6080(96)00035-4. View