» Articles » PMID: 19035511

The Influence of Sex on the Chondrogenic Potential of Muscle-derived Stem Cells: Implications for Cartilage Regeneration and Repair

Overview
Journal Arthritis Rheum
Specialty Rheumatology
Date 2008 Nov 28
PMID 19035511
Citations 42
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objective: To explore possible differences in muscle-derived stem cell (MDSC) chondrogenic differentiation in vitro and articular cartilage regeneration in vivo between murine male MDSCs (M-MDSCs) and female MDSCs (F-MDSCs).

Methods: Three different populations of M- and F-MDSCs (n = 3 of each sex) obtained via preplate technique, which separates cells based on their variable adhesion characteristics, were compared for their in vitro chondrogenic potential using pellet culture. Cells were assayed with and without retroviral transduction to express bone morphogenetic protein 4 (BMP-4). The influence of both expression of stem cell marker Sca1 and in vitro expansion on the chondrogenic potential of M- and F-MDSCs was also determined. Additionally, BMP-4-transduced M- and F-MDSCs were applied to a full-thickness articular cartilage defect (n = 5 each) on the femur of a nude rat, and the quality of the repaired tissue was evaluated by macroscopic and histologic examination.

Results: With and without BMP-4 gene transduction, M-MDSCs produced significantly larger pellets with a richer extracellular matrix, compared with F-MDSCs. Sca1 purification influenced the chondrogenic potential of MDSCs, especially M-MDSCs. Long-term culture did not affect the chondrogenic potential of M-MDSCs but did influence F-MDSCs. M-MDSCs repaired articular cartilage defects more effectively than did F-MDSCs at all time points tested, as assessed both macroscopically and histologically.

Conclusion: Our findings demonstrate that sex influences the chondrogenic differentiation and articular cartilage regeneration potential of MDSCs. Compared with female MDSCs, male MDSCs display more chondrogenic differentiation and better cartilage regeneration potential.

Citing Articles

Systemic and local lipid adaptations underlie regeneration in Drosophila melanogaster and Ambystoma mexicanum.

Kubler I, Kretzschmar J, Arredondo-Lasso M, Keeley S, Rossler L, Ganss K NPJ Regen Med. 2024; 9(1):33.

PMID: 39472660 PMC: 11522293. DOI: 10.1038/s41536-024-00375-x.


Investigating and Practicing Orthopedics at the Intersection of Sex and Gender: Understanding the Physiological Basis, Pathology, and Treatment Response of Orthopedic Conditions by Adopting a Gender Lens: A Narrative Overview.

Biz C, Khamisy-Farah R, Puce L, Szarpak L, Converti M, Ceylan H Biomedicines. 2024; 12(5).

PMID: 38790936 PMC: 11118756. DOI: 10.3390/biomedicines12050974.


Sex-dependent variation in cartilage adaptation: from degeneration to regeneration.

Patel J, Chen S, Katzmeyer T, Pei Y, Pei M Biol Sex Differ. 2023; 14(1):17.

PMID: 37024929 PMC: 10077643. DOI: 10.1186/s13293-023-00500-3.


Sex Differences in Mesenchymal Stem Cell Therapy With Gelatin-Based Microribbon Hydrogels in a Murine Long Bone Critical-Size Defect Model.

Ueno M, Zhang N, Hirata H, Barati D, Utsunomiya T, Shen H Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2021; 9:755964.

PMID: 34738008 PMC: 8560789. DOI: 10.3389/fbioe.2021.755964.


Estrogen Signaling Dictates Musculoskeletal Stem Cell Behavior: Sex Differences in Tissue Repair.

Knewtson K, Ohl N, Robinson J Tissue Eng Part B Rev. 2021; 28(4):789-812.

PMID: 34409868 PMC: 9419932. DOI: 10.1089/ten.TEB.2021.0094.