» Articles » PMID: 19034600

Incidence and Characteristics of Femoral Deformities in the Dysplastic Hip

Overview
Publisher Wolters Kluwer
Specialty Orthopedics
Date 2008 Nov 27
PMID 19034600
Citations 54
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Unlabelled: Reorientation acetabular osteotomies can correct dysplastic deformities and provide marked improvement in hip function. Deformities of the proximal femur can produce suboptimal articulation or secondary impingement after acetabular reorientation, yet the incidence and characteristics of such deformities have not been well described. To describe the proximal femoral anatomy in patients with symptomatic acetabular dysplasia, we retrospectively analyzed the radiographs of 108 hips treated with periacetabular osteotomy. The radiographic findings were compared with those in 22 control hips. In the dysplastic group, 80 hips were in women and 28 in men, and the average age was 24.8 years. Of the 108 abnormal radiographs, 44% had coxa valga and 4% coxa vara. Seventy-two percent had an aspheric or deformed femoral head and the head-neck offset was insufficient in 75% of the hips. When compared with the control hips, dysplastic hips had differences in parameters of proximal femoral anatomy that we measured. These data demonstrate a high incidence of proximal femoral abnormalities associated with acetabular dysplasia. Identifying and treating these abnormalities may optimize joint congruency and minimize secondary impingement after acetabular reorientation.

Level Of Evidence: Level II, diagnostic study. See the Guidelines for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Citing Articles

HIPPO artificial intelligence: Correlating automated radiographic femoroacetabular measurements with patient-reported outcomes in developmental hip dysplasia.

Alshaikhsalama A, Archer H, Xi Y, Ljuhar R, Wells J, Chhabra A World J Exp Med. 2024; 14(4):99359.

PMID: 39713082 PMC: 11551701. DOI: 10.5493/wjem.v14.i4.99359.


Hip Arthroscopy Utilization Disparities and Complications Amongst Ethnic Groups.

Buerba R, Dalton J, Sadhwani S, Schulz W, Atte A, Vyas D Inquiry. 2024; 61:469580241282644.

PMID: 39410760 PMC: 11487505. DOI: 10.1177/00469580241282644.


Femurs in patients with hip dysplasia have fundamental shape differences compared with cam femoroacetabular impingement.

Harris M, Gaffney B, Clohisy J, Pascual-Garrido C J Hip Preserv Surg. 2024; 11(2):132-139.

PMID: 39070210 PMC: 11272640. DOI: 10.1093/jhps/hnae004.


Morphological Changes and Concentricity of the Hip Joint During Gradual Reduction in Infants with Late-Detected Developmental Dysplasia of the Hip: A Retrospective Study.

Okuzu Y, Tsukanaka M, Goto K, Kuroda Y, Kawai T, Morita Y Indian J Orthop. 2024; 58(7):955-963.

PMID: 38948368 PMC: 11208357. DOI: 10.1007/s43465-024-01184-6.


Predictive Factors for Intraoperative Determination for the Need of Femoral Osteochondroplasty After Periacetabular Osteotomy for Acetabular Dysplasia.

Booth M, OConnor K, Parilla F, Thornton T, Nepple J, Clohisy J Iowa Orthop J. 2024; 44(1):139-144.

PMID: 38919345 PMC: 11195881.


References
1.
Tonnis D, Heinecke A . Acetabular and femoral anteversion: relationship with osteoarthritis of the hip. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1999; 81(12):1747-70. DOI: 10.2106/00004623-199912000-00014. View

2.
Notzli H, Wyss T, Stoecklin C, Schmid M, Treiber K, Hodler J . The contour of the femoral head-neck junction as a predictor for the risk of anterior impingement. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2002; 84(4):556-60. DOI: 10.1302/0301-620x.84b4.12014. View

3.
Clohisy J, Barrett S, Gordon J, Delgado E, Schoenecker P . Periacetabular osteotomy for the treatment of severe acetabular dysplasia. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2005; 87(2):254-9. DOI: 10.2106/JBJS.D.02093. View

4.
Ganz R, Klaue K, Vinh T, Mast J . A new periacetabular osteotomy for the treatment of hip dysplasias. Technique and preliminary results. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1988; (232):26-36. View

5.
Millis M, Kim Y . Rationale of osteotomy and related procedures for hip preservation: a review. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2002; (405):108-21. DOI: 10.1097/00003086-200212000-00013. View