Rapid Saliva Processing Techniques for Near Real-time Analysis of Salivary Steroids and Protein
Overview
Biotechnology
Pathology
Affiliations
Introduction: Point-of-care (POC) measurements using saliva samples have immense potential to assess systemic health and wellbeing, but sample viscosity and contaminants can affect analyses. We sought a portable clean-up method for whole saliva appropriate for use with POC measurement techniques such as biosensors.
Methods: Whole saliva from each of 13 male subjects was split into 5 fractions. Each fraction was treated with a different clean-up process: a freeze-thaw-centrifuge (FTC) step; centrifugation alone; or passage through a Mini-UniPrep polyethersulfone filter, cotton Salivette, or foam Oracol device. Following clean-up, each subject's treated saliva fractions were assayed for cortisol, testosterone, dehydroepiandrosterone (DHEA), and protein concentrations. The effects of clean-up methods on nonspecific binding (NSB) in a biosensor were also assessed.
Results: Compared with FTC, no analytes were affected by centrifugation alone. Cotton Salivettes significantly altered all analytes, with increases in cortisol (+64%), testosterone (+126%), and DHEA (off-scale) levels, and decreased protein (-21%) and biosensor NSB (-75%). Oracol foam devices decreased DHEA levels by 28%. Mini-UniPrep filtration decreased testosterone (-45%) and DHEA (-66%) concentrations while increasing cortisol (+40%).
Conclusion: No method was optimal for all analytes, highlighting the need for validation of saliva treatment methods before their adoption in rapid POC analyses.
Effects of filtration and alpha-amylase depletion on salivary biochemical composition measurements.
Franco-Martinez L, Ceron J, Martinez-Subiela S, Tvarijonaviciute A PLoS One. 2023; 18(5):e0286092.
PMID: 37235564 PMC: 10218723. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0286092.
Chen H, Feng S, Zhou W, Li Z, Richard-Greenblatt M, Wang P ACS Meas Sci Au. 2023; 2(5):414-421.
PMID: 36785662 PMC: 9885992. DOI: 10.1021/acsmeasuresciau.2c00024.
Assessing the neuroendocrine stress response in the functional neuroimaging context.
King A, Liberzon I Neuroimage. 2009; 47(3):1116-24.
PMID: 19481160 PMC: 2729803. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2009.05.055.