» Articles » PMID: 19009472

Comparison of Peak Shoulder and Elbow Mechanical Loads During Weight-relief Lifts and Sitting Pivot Transfers Among Manual Wheelchair Users with Spinal Cord Injury

Overview
Date 2008 Nov 15
PMID 19009472
Citations 15
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

This study compared shoulder and elbow joint forces and moments between weight-relief lifts (WRLs) and sitting pivot transfers (SPTs) among manual wheelchair users with spinal cord injury (SCI) (N = 13) during biomechanical laboratory assessment. Minimum and maximum values were reported for each triaxial component of the joint force at the dominant shoulder and elbow during SPTs (leading and trailing roles) and WRLs. Peak shoulder flexor and adductor moments, along with elbow flexor and extensor moments, observed during the same period were also analyzed. The SPTs predominantly exposed (p < 0.001) the shoulder joints to substantial posteriorly directed forces (leading = -2.6 N/kg; trailing = -3.1 N/kg) compared with WRLs (-2.2 N/kg), whereas superiorly directed forces (2.9 N/kg) were principally sustained ( p < 0.001) during WRLs compared with SPTs (leading = 1.5 N/kg; trailing = 1.5 N/kg). High superiorly directed forces (3.6 to 3.9 N/kg) were observed at the elbow, which were comparable (p = 0.33) between the two tasks. The peak shoulder flexor (leading = 1.36 N m/kg; trailing = 1.45 N m/kg) and adductor moments (leading only = -0.46 N m/kg), along with the peak elbow flexor moments (leading = 0.24 N m/kg; trailing = 0.15 N m/kg), were significantly more elevated (p < 0.021) during SPTs than during WRLs. Peak shoulder adductor (-0.46 vs -0.24 N m/kg) and elbow flexor moments were also more elevated ( p = 0.03) at the leading upper limb compared with the trailing one. The peak elbow extensor moments did not differ ( p = 0.167) between the two tasks (-0.17 to -0.25 N m/kg). SPTs exposed the shoulder and elbow joints to greater mechanical loads than WRLs among individuals with SCI.

Citing Articles

Shoulder Pain in Persons With Tetraplegia and the Association With Force Application During Manual Wheelchair Propulsion.

Arnet U, Bossuyt F, Beirens B, de Vries W Arch Rehabil Res Clin Transl. 2024; 6(1):100310.

PMID: 38482105 PMC: 10928276. DOI: 10.1016/j.arrct.2023.100310.


The influence of shoulder pain and fear of falling on level and non-level transfer technique.

Rice L, Peters J, Fliflet A, Sung J, Rice I J Spinal Cord Med. 2022; 45(3):364-372.

PMID: 35007474 PMC: 9135433. DOI: 10.1080/10790268.2021.1971922.


Intra- and Interrater Reliability of Remote Assessment of Transfers by Wheelchair Users Using the Transfer Assessment Instrument (Version 4.0).

Worobey L, Hibbs R, Rigot S, Boninger M, Huzinec R, Sung J Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2021; 103(4):816-821.

PMID: 33711281 PMC: 9310194. DOI: 10.1016/j.apmr.2020.12.032.


Musculoskeletal morbidity following spinal cord injury: A longitudinal cohort study of privately-insured beneficiaries.

Rodriguez G, Berri M, Lin P, Kamdar N, Mahmoudi E, Peterson M Bone. 2020; 142:115700.

PMID: 33091639 PMC: 9671069. DOI: 10.1016/j.bone.2020.115700.


Reliability and Validity of the Revised Transfer Assessment Instrument.

Worobey L, Zigler C, Huzinec R, Rigot S, Sung J, Rice L Top Spinal Cord Inj Rehabil. 2018; 24(3):217-226.

PMID: 29997425 PMC: 6037322. DOI: 10.1310/sci2403-217.