» Articles » PMID: 19004852

Two-step Selection of a Single R8 Photoreceptor: a Bistable Loop Between Senseless and Rough Locks in R8 Fate

Overview
Journal Development
Specialty Biology
Date 2008 Nov 14
PMID 19004852
Citations 36
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Patterning of sensory organs requires precise regulation of neural induction and repression. The neurocrystalline pattern of the adult Drosophila compound eye is generated by ordered selection of single founder photoreceptors (R8s) for each unit eye or ommatidium. R8 selection requires mechanisms that restrict R8 potential to a single cell from within a group of cells expressing the proneural gene atonal (ato). One model of R8 selection suggests that R8 precursors are selected from a three-cell ;R8 equivalence group' through repression of ato by the homeodomain transcription factor Rough (Ro). A second model proposes that lateral inhibition is sufficient to select a single R8 from an equipotent group of cells called the intermediate group (IG). Here, we provide new evidence that lateral inhibition, but not ro, is required for the initial selection of a single R8 precursor. We show that in ro mutants, ectopic R8s develop from R2,5 photoreceptor precursors independently of ectopic Ato and hours after normal R8s are specified. We also show that Ro directly represses the R8 specific zinc-finger transcription factor senseless (sens) in the developing R2,5 precursors to block ectopic R8 differentiation. Our results support a new model for R8 selection in which lateral inhibition establishes a transient pattern of selected R8s that is permanently reinforced by a repressive bistable loop between sens and ro. This model provides new insight into the strategies that allow successful integration of a repressive patterning signal, such as lateral inhibition, with continued developmental plasticity during retinal differentiation.

Citing Articles

Integrative genomic analyses reveal putative cell type-specific targets of the Drosophila ets transcription factor Pointed.

Bollepogu Raja K, Yeung K, Shim Y, Mardon G BMC Genomics. 2024; 25(1):103.

PMID: 38262913 PMC: 10807358. DOI: 10.1186/s12864-024-10017-7.


A single cell genomics atlas of the Drosophila larval eye reveals distinct photoreceptor developmental timelines.

Bollepogu Raja K, Yeung K, Shim Y, Li Y, Chen R, Mardon G Nat Commun. 2023; 14(1):7205.

PMID: 37938573 PMC: 10632452. DOI: 10.1038/s41467-023-43037-0.


Patterning of the retina by the morphogenetic furrow.

Warren J, Kumar J Front Cell Dev Biol. 2023; 11:1151348.

PMID: 37091979 PMC: 10117938. DOI: 10.3389/fcell.2023.1151348.


Serial Recombineering Cloning to Build Selectable and Tagged Genomic P[acman] BAC Clones for Selection Transgenesis and Functional Gene Analysis using Drosophila melanogaster.

Venken K, Matinyan N, Gonzalez Y, Dierick H Curr Protoc. 2023; 3(2):e675.

PMID: 36757632 PMC: 9923880. DOI: 10.1002/cpz1.675.


Emergence of a geometric pattern of cell fates from tissue-scale mechanics in the eye.

Gallagher K, Mani M, Carthew R Elife. 2022; 11.

PMID: 35037852 PMC: 8863370. DOI: 10.7554/eLife.72806.


References
1.
Baker N, Zitron A . Drosophila eye development: Notch and Delta amplify a neurogenic pattern conferred on the morphogenetic furrow by scabrous. Mech Dev. 1995; 49(3):173-89. DOI: 10.1016/0925-4773(94)00314-d. View

2.
Baker N, Yu S, Han D . Evolution of proneural atonal expression during distinct regulatory phases in the developing Drosophila eye. Curr Biol. 1996; 6(10):1290-301. DOI: 10.1016/s0960-9822(02)70715-x. View

3.
Tomlinson A, Ready D . Neuronal differentiation in Drosophila ommatidium. Dev Biol. 1987; 120(2):366-76. DOI: 10.1016/0012-1606(87)90239-9. View

4.
Barolo S, Carver L, Posakony J . GFP and beta-galactosidase transformation vectors for promoter/enhancer analysis in Drosophila. Biotechniques. 2000; 29(4):726, 728, 730, 732. DOI: 10.2144/00294bm10. View

5.
Brown N, Paddock S, Sattler C, Cronmiller C, Thomas B, CARROLL S . daughterless is required for Drosophila photoreceptor cell determination, eye morphogenesis, and cell cycle progression. Dev Biol. 1996; 179(1):65-78. DOI: 10.1006/dbio.1996.0241. View