» Articles » PMID: 19004772

Interactions Between Amino Acid Side Chains in Cylindrical Hydrophobic Nanopores with Applications to Peptide Stability

Overview
Specialty Science
Date 2008 Nov 14
PMID 19004772
Citations 18
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Confinement effects on protein stability are relevant in a number of biological applications ranging from encapsulation in the cylindrical cavity of a chaperonin, translocation through pores, and structure formation in the exit tunnel of the ribosome. Consequently, free energies of interaction between amino acid side chains in restricted spaces can provide insights into factors that control protein stability in nanopores. Using all-atom molecular dynamics simulations, we show that 3 pair interactions between side chains--hydrophobic (Ala-Phe), polar (Ser-Asn) and charged (Lys-Glu)--are substantially altered in hydrophobic, water-filled nanopores, relative to bulk water. When the pore holds water at bulk density, the hydrophobic pair is strongly destabilized and is driven to large separations corresponding to the width and the length of the cylindrical pore. As the water density is reduced, the preference of Ala and Phe to be at the boundary decreases, and the contact pair is preferred. A model that accounts for the volume accessible to Phe and Ala in the solvent-depleted region near the pore boundary explains the simulation results. In the pore, the hydrogen-bonded interactions between Ser and Asn have an enhanced dependence on their relative orientations, as compared with bulk water. When the side chains of Lys and Glu are restrained to be side by side, parallel to each other, then salt bridge formation is promoted in the nanopore. Based on these results, we argue and demonstrate that for a generic amphiphilic sequence, cylindrical confinement is likely to enhance thermodynamic stability relative to the bulk.

Citing Articles

Methane Hydrate-in-Oil Systems in the Presence of Natural Amino Acid-Equilibrium Phase Condition Measurements.

Almashwali A, Lal B, Khor S ACS Omega. 2024; 9(48):47442-47452.

PMID: 39651083 PMC: 11618404. DOI: 10.1021/acsomega.4c05430.


Blobs form during the single-file transport of proteins across nanopores.

Sauciuc A, Whittaker J, Tadema M, Tych K, Guskov A, Maglia G Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2024; 121(38):e2405018121.

PMID: 39264741 PMC: 11420176. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.2405018121.


Solid-State Nanopores for Biomolecular Analysis and Detection.

Stuber A, Schlotter T, Hengsteler J, Nakatsuka N Adv Biochem Eng Biotechnol. 2024; 187:283-316.

PMID: 38273209 DOI: 10.1007/10_2023_240.


The driving force for co-translational protein folding is weaker in the ribosome vestibule due to greater water ordering.

Vu Q, Jiang Y, Li M, OBrien E Chem Sci. 2021; 12(35):11851-11857.

PMID: 34659725 PMC: 8442680. DOI: 10.1039/d1sc01008e.


Retardation of Folding Rates of Substrate Proteins in the Nanocage of GroEL.

Koculi E, Thirumalai D Biochemistry. 2021; 60(6):460-464.

PMID: 33464880 PMC: 7887066. DOI: 10.1021/acs.biochem.0c00903.


References
1.
Cheung M, Thirumalai D . Nanopore-protein interactions dramatically alter stability and yield of the native state in restricted spaces. J Mol Biol. 2006; 357(2):632-43. DOI: 10.1016/j.jmb.2005.12.048. View

2.
Betancourt M, Thirumalai D . Exploring the kinetic requirements for enhancement of protein folding rates in the GroEL cavity. J Mol Biol. 1999; 287(3):627-44. DOI: 10.1006/jmbi.1999.2591. View

3.
Campanini B, Bologna S, Cannone F, Chirico G, Mozzarelli A, Bettati S . Unfolding of Green Fluorescent Protein mut2 in wet nanoporous silica gels. Protein Sci. 2005; 14(5):1125-33. PMC: 2253256. DOI: 10.1110/ps.041190805. View

4.
Eggers D, Valentine J . Molecular confinement influences protein structure and enhances thermal protein stability. Protein Sci. 2001; 10(2):250-61. PMC: 2373941. DOI: 10.1110/ps.36201. View

5.
Ravindra R, Zhao S, Gies H, Winter R . Protein encapsulation in mesoporous silicate: the effects of confinement on protein stability, hydration, and volumetric properties. J Am Chem Soc. 2004; 126(39):12224-5. DOI: 10.1021/ja046900n. View