» Articles » PMID: 19002884

Optimization of an Electroporation Protocol Using the K562 Cell Line As a Model: Role of Cell Cycle Phase and Cytoplasmic DNAses

Overview
Journal Cytotechnology
Specialties Biotechnology
Genetics
Date 2008 Nov 13
PMID 19002884
Citations 14
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The improvement of gene therapy protocols is intimately related to the establishment of efficient gene transfer methods. Electroporation has been increasingly employed in in vitro and in vivo protocols, and much attention has been given to increasing its transfection potential. The method is based on the application of an electric field of short duration and high voltage to the cells, forming reversible pores through which molecules can enter the cell. In this work, we describe the optimization of a protocol for the electroporation of K562 cells involving the combination of electric field, resistance and capacitance values. Using RPMI 1640 as pulsing buffer and 30 mug of pEGFP-N1 plasmid, 875 V cm(-1), 500 muF and infinite resistance, we achieved transfection rates of 82.41 +/- 3.03%, with 62.89 +/- 2.93% cell viability, values higher than those reported in the literature. Analyzing cell cycle after electroporation, with three different electric field conditions, we observed that in a heterogeneous population of cells, viability of G(1) cells is less affected by electroporation than that of cells in late S and G(2)/M phases. We also observed that efficiency of electroporation can be improved using the DNAse inhibitor Zn, immediately after the pulse. These results can represent a significant improvement of current methods of electroporation of animal and plant cells.

Citing Articles

Interplay between Electric Field Strength and Number of Short-Duration Pulses for Efficient Gene Electrotransfer.

Urbanskas E, Jakstys B, Venckus J, Malakauskaite P, Satkauskiene I, Morkvenaite-Vilkonciene I Pharmaceuticals (Basel). 2024; 17(7).

PMID: 39065676 PMC: 11279932. DOI: 10.3390/ph17070825.


Comparing chemical transfection, electroporation, and lentiviral vector transduction to achieve optimal transfection conditions in the Vero cell line.

Jamour P, Jamali A, Ghalyanchi Langeroudi A, Sharafabad B, Abdoli A BMC Mol Cell Biol. 2024; 25(1):15.

PMID: 38741034 PMC: 11089686. DOI: 10.1186/s12860-024-00511-x.


Effect of Experimental Electrical and Biological Parameters on Gene Transfer by Electroporation: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Potocnik T, Lebar A, Kos S, Rebersek M, Pirc E, Sersa G Pharmaceutics. 2022; 14(12).

PMID: 36559197 PMC: 9786189. DOI: 10.3390/pharmaceutics14122700.


Systemic Optimization of Gene Electrotransfer Protocol Using Hard-to-Transfect UT-7 Cell Line as a Model.

Vadeikiene R, Jakstys B, Ugenskiene R, Satkauskas S, Juozaityte E Biomedicines. 2022; 10(11).

PMID: 36359207 PMC: 9687892. DOI: 10.3390/biomedicines10112687.


The impact of impaired DNA mobility on gene electrotransfer efficiency: analysis in 3D model.

Haberl Meglic S, Pavlin M Biomed Eng Online. 2021; 20(1):85.

PMID: 34419072 PMC: 8379608. DOI: 10.1186/s12938-021-00922-3.


References
1.
Niedzinski E, Chen Y, Olson D, Parker E, Park H, Udove J . Enhanced systemic transgene expression after nonviral salivary gland transfection using a novel endonuclease inhibitor/DNA formulation. Gene Ther. 2003; 10(26):2133-8. DOI: 10.1038/sj.gt.3302125. View

2.
Overton W, McCoy Jr J . Reversing the effect of formalin on the binding of propidium iodide to DNA. Cytometry. 1994; 16(4):351-6. DOI: 10.1002/cyto.990160410. View

3.
Blomberg P, Eskandarpour M, Xia S, Sylven C, Islam K . Electroporation in combination with a plasmid vector containing SV40 enhancer elements results in increased and persistent gene expression in mouse muscle. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2002; 298(4):505-10. DOI: 10.1016/s0006-291x(02)02486-5. View

4.
Golzio M, Teissie J, Rols M . Cell synchronization effect on mammalian cell permeabilization and gene delivery by electric field. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2002; 1563(1-2):23-8. DOI: 10.1016/s0005-2736(02)00369-3. View

5.
Kunz B, Kohalmi S . Modulation of mutagenesis by deoxyribonucleotide levels. Annu Rev Genet. 1991; 25:339-59. DOI: 10.1146/annurev.ge.25.120191.002011. View