» Articles » PMID: 19002477

The Impact of the Microphone Position on the Frequency Analysis of Snoring Sounds

Overview
Date 2008 Nov 13
PMID 19002477
Citations 9
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Frequency analysis of snoring sounds has been reported as a diagnostic tool to differentiate between different sources of snoring. Several studies have been published presenting diverging results of the frequency analyses of snoring sounds. Depending on the position of the used microphones, the results of the frequency analysis of snoring sounds vary. The present study investigated the influence of different microphone positions on the outcome of the frequency analysis of snoring sounds. Nocturnal snoring was recorded simultaneously at six positions (air-coupled: 30 cm middle, 100 cm middle, 30 cm lateral to both sides of the patients' head; body contact: neck and parasternal) in five patients. The used microphones had a flat frequency response and a similar frequency range (10/40 Hz-18 kHz). Frequency analysis was performed by fast Fourier transformation and frequency bands as well as peak intensities (Peaks 1-5) were detected. Air-coupled microphones presented a wider frequency range (60 Hz-10 kHz) compared to contact microphones. The contact microphone at cervical position presented a cut off at frequencies above 300 Hz, whereas the contact microphone at parasternal position revealed a cut off above 100 Hz. On an exemplary base, the study demonstrates that frequencies above 1,000 Hz do appear in complex snoring patterns, and it is emphasised that high frequencies are imported for the interpretation of snoring sounds with respect to the identification of the source of snoring. Contact microphones might be used in screening devices, but for a natural analysis of snoring sounds the use of air-coupled microphones is indispensable.

Citing Articles

Definition of the snoring episode index based on the analyses of snoring parameters and the apnea hypopnea index.

Kim S, Cho S, Kim J Sci Rep. 2022; 12(1):6761.

PMID: 35474084 PMC: 9042919. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-022-10934-1.


Are annoyance scores based on sound pressure levels suitable for snoring assessment in the home environment?.

Fischer R, Unverdorben F, Kuehnel T, Vielsmeier V, Spanier G, Marcrum S Sleep Breath. 2020; 25(1):417-424.

PMID: 32462274 PMC: 7987700. DOI: 10.1007/s11325-020-02108-y.


Smartphone-based delivery of oropharyngeal exercises for treatment of snoring: a randomized controlled trial.

Goswami U, Black A, Krohn B, Meyers W, Iber C Sleep Breath. 2018; 23(1):243-250.

PMID: 30032464 PMC: 6340784. DOI: 10.1007/s11325-018-1690-y.


Calculating annoyance: an option to proof efficacy in ENT treatment of snoring?.

Fischer R, Kuehnel T, Merz A, Ettl T, Herzog M, Rohrmeier C Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2016; 273(12):4607-4613.

PMID: 27334525 DOI: 10.1007/s00405-016-4160-9.


Diagnosis and treatment of snoring in adults-S2k Guideline of the German Society of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery.

Stuck B, Dreher A, Heiser C, Herzog M, Kuhnel T, Maurer J Sleep Breath. 2014; 19(1):135-48.

PMID: 24729153 DOI: 10.1007/s11325-014-0979-8.


References
1.
Miyazaki S, Itasaka Y, Ishikawa K, TOGAWA K . Acoustic analysis of snoring and the site of airway obstruction in sleep related respiratory disorders. Acta Otolaryngol Suppl. 1998; 537:47-51. View

2.
Quinn S, Huang L, Ellis P, Williams J . The differentiation of snoring mechanisms using sound analysis. Clin Otolaryngol Allied Sci. 1996; 21(2):119-23. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2273.1996.tb01313.x. View

3.
Schafer J . [How can one recognize a velum snorer?]. Laryngorhinootologie. 1989; 68(5):290-4. DOI: 10.1055/s-2007-998336. View

4.
Jones T, Ho M, Earis J, Swift A, Charters P . Acoustic parameters of snoring sound to compare natural snores with snores during 'steady-state' propofol sedation. Clin Otolaryngol. 2006; 31(1):46-52. DOI: 10.1111/j.1749-4486.2006.01136.x. View

5.
Saunders N, Tassone P, Wood G, Norris A, Harries M, Kotecha B . Is acoustic analysis of snoring an alternative to sleep nasendoscopy?. Clin Otolaryngol Allied Sci. 2004; 29(3):242-6. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2273.2004.00800.x. View