» Articles » PMID: 19002282

Using Answer-until-correct Examinations to Provide Immediate Feedback to Students in a Pharmacokinetics Course

Overview
Journal Am J Pharm Educ
Specialty Medical Education
Date 2008 Nov 13
PMID 19002282
Citations 10
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objectives: To implement an answer-until-correct examination format for a pharmacokinetics course and determine whether this format assessed pharmacy students' mastery of the desired learning outcomes as well as a mixed format examination (eg, one with a combination of open-ended and fill-in-the-blank questions).

Methods: Students in a core pharmacokinetics course were given 3 examinations in answer-until-correct format. The format allowed students multiple attempts at answering each question, with points allocated based on the number of attempts required to correctly answer the question. Examination scores were compared to those of students in the previous year as a control.

Results: The grades of students who were given the immediate feedback examination format were equivalent to those of students in the previous year. The students preferred the testing format because it allowed multiple attempts to answer questions and provided immediate feedback. Some students reported increased anxiety because of the new examination format.

Discussion: The immediate feedback format assessed students' mastery of course outcomes, provided immediate feedback to encourage deep learning and critical-thinking skills, and was preferred by students over the traditional examination format.

Citing Articles

Use of Team-Based Learning Pedagogy to Prepare for a Pharmacy School Accreditation Self-Study.

Vinall R, Malhotra A, Puglisi J Pharmacy (Basel). 2021; 9(3).

PMID: 34564555 PMC: 8482079. DOI: 10.3390/pharmacy9030148.


Factors Affecting Student Time to Examination Completion.

Persky A, Mierzwa H Am J Pharm Educ. 2018; 82(7):6321.

PMID: 30323386 PMC: 6181161. DOI: 10.5688/ajpe6321.


Thinking Clinically from the Beginning: Early Introduction of the Pharmacists' Patient Care Process.

Rivkin A Am J Pharm Educ. 2017; 80(10):164.

PMID: 28179713 PMC: 5289720. DOI: 10.5688/ajpe8010164.


Comparison of answer-until-correct and full-credit assessments in a team-based learning course.

Farland M, Barlow P, Levi Lancaster T, Franks A Am J Pharm Educ. 2015; 79(2):21.

PMID: 25861102 PMC: 4386742. DOI: 10.5688/ajpe79221.


An eight-year retrospective study in "flipped" pharmacokinetics courses.

Persky A, Dupuis R Am J Pharm Educ. 2015; 78(10):190.

PMID: 25657377 PMC: 4315212. DOI: 10.5688/ajpe7810190.


References
1.
Musch J, Broder A . Test anxiety versus academic skills: a comparison of two alternative models for predicting performance in a statistics exam. Br J Educ Psychol. 1999; 69 ( Pt 1):105-16. DOI: 10.1348/000709999157608. View

2.
Morris L, Fulmer R . Test anxiety (worry and emotionality) changes during academic testing as a function of feedback and test importance. J Educ Psychol. 1976; 68(6):817-24. View

3.
Auerbach S . Effects of orienting instructions, feedback-information, and trait-anxiety level on state-anxiety. Psychol Rep. 1973; 33(3):779-86. DOI: 10.2466/pr0.1973.33.3.779. View

4.
Clark 2nd J, Fox P, Schneider H . Feedback, test anxiety and performance in a college course. Psychol Rep. 1998; 82(1):203-8. DOI: 10.2466/pr0.1998.82.1.203. View

5.
Epstein M, Brosvic G . Students prefer the immediate feedback assessment technique. Psychol Rep. 2002; 90(3 Pt 2):1136-8. DOI: 10.2466/pr0.2002.90.3c.1136. View