» Articles » PMID: 18990652

Evaluation of Head Orientation and Neck Muscle EMG Signals As Command Inputs to a Human-computer Interface for Individuals with High Tetraplegia

Overview
Publisher IEEE
Date 2008 Nov 8
PMID 18990652
Citations 57
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

We investigated the performance of three user interfaces for restoration of cursor control in individuals with tetraplegia: head orientation, electromyography (EMG) from face and neck muscles, and a standard computer mouse (for comparison). Subjects engaged in a 2-D, center-out, Fitts' Law style task and performance was evaluated using several measures. Overall, head orientation commanded motion resembled mouse commanded cursor motion (smooth, accurate movements to all targets), although with somewhat lower performance. EMG commanded movements exhibited a higher average speed, but other performance measures were lower, particularly for diagonal targets. Compared to head orientation, EMG as a cursor command source was less accurate, was more affected by target direction and was more prone to overshoot the target. In particular, EMG commands for diagonal targets were more sequential, moving first in one direction and then the other rather than moving simultaneous in the two directions. While the relative performance of each user interface differs, each has specific advantages depending on the application.

Citing Articles

Battery-free head orientation measurement using passive RFID tags.

Jo J, Park H Wearable Technol. 2025; 6:e7.

PMID: 40071244 PMC: 11894406. DOI: 10.1017/wtc.2024.26.


Interpreting Stroke-Impaired Electromyography Patterns through Explainable Artificial Intelligence.

Hussain I, Jany R Sensors (Basel). 2024; 24(5).

PMID: 38474928 PMC: 10935041. DOI: 10.3390/s24051392.


Human-machine interface for two-dimensional steering control with the auricular muscles.

Pinheiro D, Faber J, Micera S, Shokur S Front Neurorobot. 2023; 17:1154427.

PMID: 37342389 PMC: 10277645. DOI: 10.3389/fnbot.2023.1154427.


Ability-Based Methods for Personalized Keyboard Generation.

Mitchell C, Cler G, Fager S, Contessa P, Roy S, De Luca G Multimodal Technol Interact. 2022; 6(8).

PMID: 36313956 PMC: 9608338. DOI: 10.3390/mti6080067.


Controlling an effector with eye movements: The effect of entangled sensory and motor responsibilities.

Schultz J, Slifkin A, Schearer E PLoS One. 2022; 17(2):e0263440.

PMID: 35113943 PMC: 8812848. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0263440.


References
1.
Radwin R, Vanderheiden G, Lin M . A method for evaluating head-controlled computer input devices using Fitts' law. Hum Factors. 1990; 32(4):423-38. DOI: 10.1177/001872089003200405. View

2.
Jagacinski R, Monk D . Fitts' Law in two dimensions with hand and head movements. J Mot Behav. 1985; 17(1):77-95. DOI: 10.1080/00222895.1985.10735338. View

3.
Smith B, Mulcahey M, Betz R . Development of an upper extremity FES system for individuals with C4 tetraplegia. IEEE Trans Rehabil Eng. 1996; 4(4):264-70. DOI: 10.1109/86.547926. View

4.
Paciga J, Richard P, Scott R . Error rate in five-state myoelectric control systems. Med Biol Eng Comput. 1980; 18(3):287-90. DOI: 10.1007/BF02443381. View

5.
Lau C, OLeary S . Comparison of computer interface devices for persons with severe physical disabilities. Am J Occup Ther. 1993; 47(11):1022-30. DOI: 10.5014/ajot.47.11.1022. View