» Articles » PMID: 18989677

Role of Broadcast Harmonics in Echo Delay Perception by Big Brown Bats

Overview
Publisher Springer
Date 2008 Nov 8
PMID 18989677
Citations 10
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Big brown bats (Eptesicus fuscus) emit frequency-modulated (FM) echolocation sounds containing two principal down-sweeping harmonics (FM(1) approximately 55-25 kHz, FM(2) approximately 105-50 kHz). To determine whether each harmonic contributes to perception of echo delay, bats were trained to discriminate between "split-harmonic" echoes that differed in delay. The bat's broadcasts were picked up with microphones, and FM(1) and FM(2) were separated with highpass and lowpass filters at about 55 kHz, where they overlap in frequency. Both harmonics then were delivered from loudspeakers as positive stimuli in a 2-choice delay discrimination procedure with FM(1) delayed 3.16 ms and FM(2) delayed 3.46 ms (300 mus delay split). Negative stimuli contained FM(1) and FM(2) with the same filtering but no delay separation. These were presented at different overall delays from 11 down to 3 ms to measure the bat's delay discrimination acuity for each harmonic in the split harmonic echoes. The bats determined the delays of both FM(1) and FM(2), but performance was overlaid by a broad pedestal of poor performance that extended for 800 micros. Splitting the harmonics by 300 micros appears to defocus the bat's representation of delay, revealing the existence of a process for recognizing the normally simultaneous occurrence of the harmonics.

Citing Articles

Functional differences in echolocation call design in an adaptive radiation of bats.

Leiser-Miller L, Santana S Ecol Evol. 2021; 11(22):16153-16164.

PMID: 34824818 PMC: 8601877. DOI: 10.1002/ece3.8296.


A comprehensive computational model of animal biosonar signal processing.

Ming C, Haro S, Simmons A, Simmons J PLoS Comput Biol. 2021; 17(2):e1008677.

PMID: 33596199 PMC: 7888678. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1008677.


How frequency hopping suppresses pulse-echo ambiguity in bat biosonar.

Ming C, Bates M, Simmons J Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2020; 117(29):17288-17295.

PMID: 32632013 PMC: 7382275. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.2001105117.


The electrocardiogram signal of Seba's short-tailed bat, Carollia perspicillata.

Mihova D, Hechavarria J J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol. 2016; 202(7):517-26.

PMID: 27283857 DOI: 10.1007/s00359-016-1098-8.


Target shape perception and clutter rejection use the same mechanism in bat sonar.

Warnecke M, Simmons J J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol. 2016; 202(5):371-9.

PMID: 27041334 DOI: 10.1007/s00359-016-1085-0.


References
1.
Simmons J . The resolution of target range by echolocating bats. J Acoust Soc Am. 1973; 54(1):157-73. DOI: 10.1121/1.1913559. View

2.
Kick S, Simmons J . Automatic gain control in the bat's sonar receiver and the neuroethology of echolocation. J Neurosci. 1984; 4(11):2725-37. PMC: 6564721. View

3.
Simmons J, Moffat A, Masters W . Sonar gain control and echo detection thresholds in the echolocating bat, Eptesicus fuscus. J Acoust Soc Am. 1992; 91(2):1150-63. DOI: 10.1121/1.402641. View

4.
Boonman A, Ostwald J . A modeling approach to explain pulse design in bats. Biol Cybern. 2007; 97(2):159-72. DOI: 10.1007/s00422-007-0164-2. View

5.
Saillant P, Simmons J, Bouffard F, Lee D, Dear S . Biosonar signals impinging on the target during interception by big brown bats, Eptesicus fuscus. J Acoust Soc Am. 2007; 121(5 Pt1):3001-10. DOI: 10.1121/1.2714920. View