» Articles » PMID: 18989609

Comparison of a PACS Workstation with Laser Hard Copies for Detecting Scaphoid Fractures in the Emergency Department

Overview
Journal J Digit Imaging
Publisher Springer
Date 2008 Nov 8
PMID 18989609
Citations 2
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Picture archiving and communication systems (PACS) for imaging studies is rapidly being adopted in hospitals throughout the UK. However, very little comparison has been made between PACS and laser hard copies for assessing the diagnostic accuracy of detecting fractures by emergency physicians. A prospective paired comparison study was undertaken looking at correct reporting of scaphoid X-rays on PACS and conventional film by emergency department medical staff. A total of 34 imaging studies were reported by 38 physicians using both PACS workstations and laser-printed films. The percentage of emergency physicians correctly reporting imaging studies was similar when comparing PACS images to laser film copies (80.7% versus 81.0%). The sensitivity and specificity of PACS for diagnosing scaphoid fractures was 79.5% and 81.6%, versus 78.1% and 83.8% for conventional films. There is no significant difference in accuracy of diagnosis between PACS and laser film copies when scaphoid X-rays are reported by emergency physicians.

Citing Articles

An Evaluation Protocol for Picture Archiving and Communication System: a Systematic Review.

Tabatabaei M, Langarizadeh M, Tavakol K Acta Inform Med. 2017; 25(4):250-253.

PMID: 29284915 PMC: 5723173. DOI: 10.5455/aim.2017.25.250-253.


Can paper replace laser film to communicate the results of wrist radiographs in trauma cases? A reproducibility study of the reading of wrist trauma case radiographs on a PACS workstation, laser film, and paper.

Teixeira P, Zabel J, Baumann C, Albizzati S, Coudane H, Winninger D J Digit Imaging. 2013; 26(6):1013-9.

PMID: 23779150 PMC: 3824919. DOI: 10.1007/s10278-013-9613-8.

References
1.
Patton G, Gardner R . Evaluation of picture archiving technology. Crit Care Med. 2000; 28(4):1231-2. DOI: 10.1097/00003246-200004000-00060. View

2.
Weatherburn G, Bryan S, Nicholas A, Cocks R . The effect of a picture archiving and communications system (PACS) on diagnostic performance in the accident and emergency department. J Accid Emerg Med. 2000; 17(3):180-4. PMC: 1725383. DOI: 10.1136/emj.17.3.180. View

3.
Strickland N . PACS (picture archiving and communication systems): filmless radiology. Arch Dis Child. 2000; 83(1):82-6. PMC: 1718393. DOI: 10.1136/adc.83.1.82. View

4.
Cox B, Dawe N . Evaluation of the impact of a PACS system on an intensive care unit. J Manag Med. 2002; 16(2-3):199-205. DOI: 10.1108/02689230210434934. View

5.
Cox G, Cook L, McMILLAN J, Rosenthal S, Dwyer 3rd S . Chest radiography: comparison of high-resolution digital displays with conventional and digital film. Radiology. 1990; 176(3):771-6. DOI: 10.1148/radiology.176.3.2389035. View