» Articles » PMID: 18982331

Does a Computer-aided Detection Algorithm in a Second Read Paradigm Enhance the Performance of Experienced Computed Tomography Colonography Readers in a Population of Increased Risk?

Overview
Journal Eur Radiol
Specialty Radiology
Date 2008 Nov 5
PMID 18982331
Citations 10
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

We prospectively determined whether computer-aided detection (CAD) could improve the performance characteristics of computed tomography colonography (CTC) in a population of increased risk for colorectal cancer. Therefore, we included 170 consecutive patients that underwent both CTC and colonoscopy. All findings >or=6 mm were evaluated at colonoscopy by segmental unblinding. We determined per-patient sensitivity and specificity for polyps >or=6 mm and >or=10 mm without and with computer-aided detection (CAD). The McNemar test was used for comparison the results without and with CAD. Unblinded colonoscopy detected 50 patients with lesions >or=6 mm and 25 patients with lesions >or=10 mm. Sensitivity of CTC without CAD for these size categories was 80% (40/50, 95% CI: 69-81%) and 64% (16/25, 95% CI: 45-83%), respectively. CTC with CAD detected one additional patient with a lesion >or=6 mm and two with a lesion >or=10 mm, resulting in a sensitivity of 82% (41/50, 95% CI: 71-93%) (p = 0.50) and 72% (18/25, 95% CI: 54-90%) (p = 1.0), respectively. Specificity without CAD for polyps >or=6 mm and >or=10 mm was 84% (101/120, 95% CI: 78-91%) and 94% (136/145, 95% CI: 90-98%), respectively. With CAD, the specificity remained (nearly) unchanged: 83% (99/120, 95% CI: 76-89%) and 94% (136/145, 95% CI: 90-98%), respectively. Thus, although CTC with CAD detected a few more patients than CTC without CAD, it had no statistically significant positive influence on CTC performance.

Citing Articles

CT colonography: effect of computer-aided detection of colonic polyps as a second and concurrent reader for general radiologists with moderate experience in CT colonography.

Mang T, Bogoni L, Anand V, Chandra D, Curtin A, Lev-Toaff A Eur Radiol. 2014; 24(7):1466-76.

PMID: 24816931 DOI: 10.1007/s00330-014-3158-1.


Probabilistic method for context-sensitive detection of polyps in CT colonography.

Nappi J, Regge D, Yoshida H Proc SPIE Int Soc Opt Eng. 2014; 7963.

PMID: 24665192 PMC: 3962666. DOI: 10.1117/12.878207.


Comparative performance of a primary-reader and second-reader paradigm of computer-aided detection for CT colonography in a low-prevalence screening population.

Miyake M, Iinuma G, Taylor S, Halligan S, Morimoto T, Ichikawa T Jpn J Radiol. 2013; 31(5):310-9.

PMID: 23420274 DOI: 10.1007/s11604-013-0187-7.


Haustral fold segmentation with curvature-guided level set evolution.

Zhu H, Barish M, Pickhardt P, Liang Z IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 2012; 60(2):321-31.

PMID: 23193228 PMC: 3552127. DOI: 10.1109/TBME.2012.2226242.


The second ESGAR consensus statement on CT colonography.

Neri E, Halligan S, Hellstrom M, Lefere P, Mang T, Regge D Eur Radiol. 2012; 23(3):720-9.

PMID: 22983280 PMC: 3563960. DOI: 10.1007/s00330-012-2632-x.


References
1.
Summers R, Yao J, Pickhardt P, Franaszek M, Bitter I, Brickman D . Computed tomographic virtual colonoscopy computer-aided polyp detection in a screening population. Gastroenterology. 2005; 129(6):1832-44. PMC: 1576342. DOI: 10.1053/j.gastro.2005.08.054. View

2.
Baker M, Bogoni L, Obuchowski N, Dass C, Kendzierski R, Remer E . Computer-aided detection of colorectal polyps: can it improve sensitivity of less-experienced readers? Preliminary findings. Radiology. 2007; 245(1):140-9. DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2451061116. View

3.
Vos F, van Gelder R, Serlie I, Florie J, Nio C, Glas A . Three-dimensional display modes for CT colonography: conventional 3D virtual colonoscopy versus unfolded cube projection. Radiology. 2003; 228(3):878-85. DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2283020846. View

4.
van Gelder R, Florie J, Nio C, Jensch S, de Jager S, Vos F . A comparison of primary two- and three-dimensional methods to review CT colonography. Eur Radiol. 2006; 17(5):1181-92. DOI: 10.1007/s00330-006-0487-8. View

5.
. The Paris endoscopic classification of superficial neoplastic lesions: esophagus, stomach, and colon: November 30 to December 1, 2002. Gastrointest Endosc. 2003; 58(6 Suppl):S3-43. DOI: 10.1016/s0016-5107(03)02159-x. View