» Articles » PMID: 18982111

Silencing the Critics: Understanding the Effects of Cocaine Sensitization on Dorsolateral and Ventral Striatum in the Context of an Actor/critic Model

Overview
Journal Front Neurosci
Date 2008 Nov 5
PMID 18982111
Citations 52
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

A critical problem in daily decision making is how to choose actions now in order to bring about rewards later. Indeed, many of our actions have long-term consequences, and it is important to not be myopic in balancing the pros and cons of different options, but rather to take into account both immediate and delayed consequences of actions. Failures to do so may be manifest as persistent, maladaptive decision-making, one example of which is addiction where behavior seems to be driven by the immediate positive experiences with drugs, despite the delayed adverse consequences. A recent study by Takahashi et al. (2007) investigated the effects of cocaine sensitization on decision making in rats and showed that drug use resulted in altered representations in the ventral striatum and the dorsolateral striatum, areas that have been implicated in the neural instantiation of a computational solution to optimal long-term actions selection called the Actor/Critic framework. In this Focus article we discuss their results and offer a computational interpretation in terms of drug-induced impairments in the Critic. We first survey the different lines of evidence linking the subparts of the striatum to the Actor/Critic framework, and then suggest two possible scenarios of breakdown that are suggested by Takahashi et al.'s (2007) data. As both are compatible with the current data, we discuss their different predictions and how these could be empirically tested in order to further elucidate (and hopefully inch towards curing) the neural basis of drug addiction.

Citing Articles

Striatal arbitration between choice strategies guides few-shot adaptation.

Yang M, Jung M, Lee S Nat Commun. 2025; 16(1):1811.

PMID: 39979316 PMC: 11842591. DOI: 10.1038/s41467-025-57049-5.


Distributed representations of temporally accumulated reward prediction errors in the mouse cortex.

Makino H, Suhaimi A Sci Adv. 2025; 11(4):eadi4782.

PMID: 39841828 PMC: 11753378. DOI: 10.1126/sciadv.adi4782.


Ventral frontostriatal circuitry mediates the computation of reinforcement from symbolic gains and losses.

Tang H, Bartolo R, Averbeck B Neuron. 2024; 112(22):3782-3795.e5.

PMID: 39321792 PMC: 11581918. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuron.2024.08.018.


A biophysical model for dopamine modulating working memory through reward system in obsessive-compulsive disorder.

Yin L, Han F, Wang Q Cogn Neurodyn. 2024; 18(4):1895-1911.

PMID: 39104680 PMC: 11297891. DOI: 10.1007/s11571-023-09999-z.


Distinct Action Signals by Subregions in the Nucleus Accumbens during STOP-Change Performance.

Ashton S, Sharalla P, Kang N, Brockett A, McCarthy M, Roesch M J Neurosci. 2024; 44(29).

PMID: 38897724 PMC: 11255435. DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0020-24.2024.


References
1.
Smith-Roe S, Kelley A . Coincident activation of NMDA and dopamine D1 receptors within the nucleus accumbens core is required for appetitive instrumental learning. J Neurosci. 2000; 20(20):7737-42. PMC: 6772875. View

2.
Suri R, Schultz W . A neural network model with dopamine-like reinforcement signal that learns a spatial delayed response task. Neuroscience. 1999; 91(3):871-90. DOI: 10.1016/s0306-4522(98)00697-6. View

3.
Roesch M, Takahashi Y, Gugsa N, Bissonette G, Schoenbaum G . Previous cocaine exposure makes rats hypersensitive to both delay and reward magnitude. J Neurosci. 2007; 27(1):245-50. PMC: 2249703. DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4080-06.2007. View

4.
Simon N, Mendez I, Setlow B . Cocaine exposure causes long-term increases in impulsive choice. Behav Neurosci. 2007; 121(3):543-9. PMC: 2581406. DOI: 10.1037/0735-7044.121.3.543. View

5.
Kish S, Shannak K, Hornykiewicz O . Uneven pattern of dopamine loss in the striatum of patients with idiopathic Parkinson's disease. Pathophysiologic and clinical implications. N Engl J Med. 1988; 318(14):876-80. DOI: 10.1056/NEJM198804073181402. View