» Articles » PMID: 18980675

Clinical and Cost-effectiveness of Internal Limiting Membrane Peeling for Patients with Idiopathic Full Thickness Macular Hole. Protocol for a Randomised Controlled Trial: FILMS (Full-thickness Macular Hole and Internal Limiting Membrane Peeling...

Overview
Journal Trials
Publisher Biomed Central
Date 2008 Nov 5
PMID 18980675
Citations 6
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: A full-thickness macular hole (FTMH) is a common retinal condition associated with impaired vision. Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) have demonstrated that surgery, by means of pars plana vitrectomy and post-operative intraocular tamponade with gas, is effective for stage 2, 3 and 4 FTMH. Internal limiting membrane (ILM) peeling has been introduced as an additional surgical manoeuvre to increase the success of the surgery; i.e. increase rates of hole closure and visual improvement. However, little robust evidence exists supporting the superiority of ILM peeling compared with no-peeling techniques. The purpose of FILMS (Full-Thickness Macular Hole and Internal Limiting Membrane Peeling Study) is to determine whether ILM peeling improves the visual function, the anatomical closure of FTMH, and the quality of life of patients affected by this disorder, and the cost-effectiveness of the surgery.

Methods/design: Patients with stage 2-3 idiopathic FTMH of less or equal than 18 months duration (based on symptoms reported by the participant) and with a visual acuity </= 20/40 in the study eye will be enrolled in this FILMS from eight sites across the UK and Ireland. Participants will be randomised to receive combined cataract surgery (phacoemulsification and intraocular lens implantation) and pars plana vitrectomy with postoperative intraocular tamponade with gas, with or without ILM peeling. The primary outcome is distance visual acuity at 6 months. Secondary outcomes include distance visual acuity at 3 and 24 months, near visual acuity at 3, 6, and 24 months, contrast sensitivity at 6 months, reading speed at 6 months, anatomical closure of the macular hole at each time point (1, 3, 6, and 24 months), health related quality of life (HRQOL) at six months, costs to the health service and the participant, incremental costs per quality adjusted life year (QALY) and adverse events.

Discussion: FILMS will provide high quality evidence on the role of ILM peeling in FTMH surgery.

Trial Registration: This trial is registered with Current Controlled Trials ISRCTN number 33175422 and Clinical Trials.gov identifier NCT00286507.

Citing Articles

Negative effects of enlarging internal limiting membrane peeling for idiopathic macular hole surgery.

Nie Z, Liu B, Wang Y, Chen Q, Wei J, Yang M Int J Ophthalmol. 2022; 15(11):1806-1813.

PMID: 36404972 PMC: 9631185. DOI: 10.18240/ijo.2022.11.11.


Outcomes of Idiopathic Full-Thickness Macular Hole Surgery: Comparing Two Different ILM Peeling Sizes.

Khodabande A, Mahmoudi A, Faghihi H, Bazvand F, Ebrahimi E, Riazi-Esfahani H J Ophthalmol. 2020; 2020:1619450.

PMID: 32908679 PMC: 7450298. DOI: 10.1155/2020/1619450.


The impact of extent of internal limiting membrane peeling on anatomical outcomes of macular hole surgery: results of a 54-week randomized clinical trial.

Yao Y, Qu J, Dong C, Li X, Liang J, Yin H Acta Ophthalmol. 2018; 97(3):303-312.

PMID: 30187641 PMC: 6585771. DOI: 10.1111/aos.13853.


Instrumental variable methods for a binary outcome were used to informatively address noncompliance in a randomized trial in surgery.

Cook J, MacLennan G, Palmer T, Lois N, Emsley R J Clin Epidemiol. 2017; 96:126-132.

PMID: 29157924 PMC: 5862096. DOI: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2017.11.011.


A review of current management of vitreomacular traction and macular hole.

Garcia-Layana A, Garcia-Arumi J, Ruiz-Moreno J, Arias-Barquet L, Cabrera-Lopez F, Figueroa M J Ophthalmol. 2015; 2015:809640.

PMID: 25821592 PMC: 4363823. DOI: 10.1155/2015/809640.


References
1.
Kwok A, Lai T, Wong V . Idiopathic macular hole surgery in Chinese patients: a randomised study to compare indocyanine green-assisted internal limiting membrane peeling with no internal limiting membrane peeling. Hong Kong Med J. 2005; 11(4):259-66. View

2.
Mester V, Kuhn F . Internal limiting membrane removal in the management of full-thickness macular holes. Am J Ophthalmol. 2000; 129(6):769-77. DOI: 10.1016/s0002-9394(00)00358-5. View

3.
. The age-related eye disease study (AREDS) system for classifying cataracts from photographs: AREDS report no. 4. Am J Ophthalmol. 2001; 131(2):167-75. PMC: 2032014. DOI: 10.1016/s0002-9394(00)00732-7. View

4.
Benson W, Cruickshanks K, Fong D, Williams G, Bloome M, Frambach D . Surgical management of macular holes: a report by the American Academy of Ophthalmology. Ophthalmology. 2001; 108(7):1328-35. DOI: 10.1016/s0161-6420(01)00731-x. View

5.
Ullern M, Roman S, Dhalluin J, Lozato P, Grillon S, Bellefqih S . [Contribution of intravitreal infracyanine green to macular hole and epimacular membrane surgery: preliminary study]. J Fr Ophtalmol. 2003; 25(9):915-20. View