» Articles » PMID: 18958849

A Role for Hilar Cells in Pattern Separation in the Dentate Gyrus: a Computational Approach

Overview
Journal Hippocampus
Publisher Wiley
Date 2008 Oct 30
PMID 18958849
Citations 94
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

We present a simple computational model of the dentate gyrus to evaluate the hypothesis that pattern separation, defined as the ability to transform a set of similar input patterns into a less-similar set of output patterns, is dynamically regulated by hilar neurons. Prior models of the dentate gyrus have generally fallen into two categories: simplified models that have focused on a single granule cell layer and its ability to perform pattern separation, and large-scale and biophysically realistic models of dentate gyrus, which include hilar cells, but which have not specifically addressed pattern separation. The present model begins to bridge this gap. The model includes two of the major subtypes of hilar cells: excitatory hilar mossy cells and inhibitory hilar interneurons that receive input from and project to the perforant path terminal zone (HIPP cells). In the model, mossy cells and HIPP cells provide a mechanism for dynamic regulation of pattern separation, allowing the system to upregulate and downregulate pattern separation in response to environmental and task demands. Specifically, pattern separation in the model can be strongly decreased by decreasing mossy cell function and/or by increasing HIPP cell function; pattern separation can be increased by the opposite manipulations. We propose that hilar cells may similarly mediate dynamic regulation of pattern separation in the dentate gyrus in vivo, not only because of their connectivity within the dentate gyrus, but also because of their modulation by brainstem inputs and by the axons that "backproject" from area CA3 pyramidal cells.

Citing Articles

Regulation of dentate gyrus pattern separation by hilus ectopic granule cells.

Yin H, Sun X, Yang K, Lan Y, Lu Z Cogn Neurodyn. 2025; 19(1):10.

PMID: 39801911 PMC: 11718051. DOI: 10.1007/s11571-024-10204-y.


Adult neurogenesis in the hippocampal dentate gyrus affects sparsely synchronized rhythms, associated with pattern separation and integration.

Kim S, Lim W Cogn Neurodyn. 2024; 18(5):2311-2321.

PMID: 39555267 PMC: 11564722. DOI: 10.1007/s11571-024-10089-x.


An Information-Geometric Formulation of Pattern Separation and Evaluation of Existing Indices.

Wang H, Singh S, Trappenberg T, Nunes A Entropy (Basel). 2024; 26(9).

PMID: 39330071 PMC: 11431106. DOI: 10.3390/e26090737.


Effect of adult-born immature granule cells on pattern separation in the hippocampal dentate gyrus.

Kim S, Lim W Cogn Neurodyn. 2024; 18(4):2077-2093.

PMID: 39104672 PMC: 11297892. DOI: 10.1007/s11571-023-09985-5.


Somatostatin Interneurons Recruit Pre- and Postsynaptic GABA Receptors in the Adult Mouse Dentate Gyrus.

Watson T, Booker S eNeuro. 2024; 11(8).

PMID: 39084907 PMC: 11334949. DOI: 10.1523/ENEURO.0115-24.2024.


References
1.
Rolls E . An attractor network in the hippocampus: theory and neurophysiology. Learn Mem. 2007; 14(11):714-31. DOI: 10.1101/lm.631207. View

2.
Patton P, McNaughton B . Connection matrix of the hippocampal formation: I. The dentate gyrus. Hippocampus. 1995; 5(4):245-86. DOI: 10.1002/hipo.450050402. View

3.
Treves A, Tashiro A, Witter M, Moser E . What is the mammalian dentate gyrus good for?. Neuroscience. 2008; 154(4):1155-72. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2008.04.073. View

4.
Scharfman H . Electrophysiological evidence that dentate hilar mossy cells are excitatory and innervate both granule cells and interneurons. J Neurophysiol. 1995; 74(1):179-94. DOI: 10.1152/jn.1995.74.1.179. View

5.
Houser C . Interneurons of the dentate gyrus: an overview of cell types, terminal fields and neurochemical identity. Prog Brain Res. 2007; 163:217-32. DOI: 10.1016/S0079-6123(07)63013-1. View