» Articles » PMID: 18958407

Return to Work After Injury: a Review of Evidence Regarding Expectations and Injury Perceptions, and Their Influence on Outcome

Overview
Journal J Occup Rehabil
Publisher Springer
Date 2008 Oct 30
PMID 18958407
Citations 27
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Introduction: Work disability after injury is a complex problem, and there remains a lack of clarity about what factors are most influential on whether or not someone will experience difficulty returning to work. Increasingly, expectations and injury perceptions are being explored as potential factors in work disability, because of their role in influencing behaviours.

Methods: This paper reviewed the literature regarding how expectations (regarding injury recovery and return to work) and injury perceptions relate to return to work outcome. A wide range of electronic journal databases were searched, and identified articles were critically appraised to assess quality and relevance. Results were then synthesised and discussed in relation to the evidence available regarding the role of expectations and injury perceptions in return to work, and implications for practice and further research.

Results: Findings showed that evidence regarding to how both expectations and injury perceptions contribute to return to work outcome is limited. Some suggestions for application to practice are made. Methodological issues and key points to consider for future research are discussed.

Conclusions: While in general little is known about how much expectations and injury perceptions influence return to work outcome, it is clear that the issue requires further investigation. Key limits to current knowledge result from inadequate methods of measuring expectation/s, lack of clear definitions of 'return to work outcome' and differences in timeframes and populations. Never-the-less, there is promising evidence to suggest that, in particular, pain catastrophizing research is warranted due to its correlation with outcome and amenability to change.

Citing Articles

Operative Versus Nonoperative Management of High-Grade Acromioclavicular Injuries: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Adra M, Mohamed Haroon A, Milchem H, Suresh S, Khair Y, El Merkabaoui H Cureus. 2025; 16(12):e76682.

PMID: 39898132 PMC: 11785354. DOI: 10.7759/cureus.76682.


Preoperative and Postoperative Kinesiophobia Influences Postoperative Outcome Measures Following Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Prospective Study.

Longo U, Marino M, Rizzello G, De Salvatore S, Piergentili I, Denaro V J Clin Med. 2023; 12(14).

PMID: 37510972 PMC: 10381941. DOI: 10.3390/jcm12144858.


Understanding Patient Expectations of Health Care: A Qualitative Study.

El-Haddad C, Hegazi I, Hu W J Patient Exp. 2021; 7(6):1724-1731.

PMID: 33457636 PMC: 7786689. DOI: 10.1177/2374373520921692.


Search methods for prognostic factor systematic reviews: a methodologic investigation.

Boulos L, Ogilvie R, Hayden J J Med Libr Assoc. 2021; 109(1):23-32.

PMID: 33424461 PMC: 7772979. DOI: 10.5195/jmla.2021.939.


Development of the generic, multidimensional Treatment Expectation Questionnaire (TEX-Q) through systematic literature review, expert surveys and qualitative interviews.

Alberts J, Lowe B, Glahn M, Petrie K, Laferton J, Nestoriuc Y BMJ Open. 2020; 10(8):e036169.

PMID: 32819942 PMC: 7440833. DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-036169.


References
1.
Hogg-Johnson S, Cole D . Early prognostic factors for duration on temporary total benefits in the first year among workers with compensated occupational soft tissue injuries. Occup Environ Med. 2003; 60(4):244-53. PMC: 1740514. DOI: 10.1136/oem.60.4.244. View

2.
Fritz J, George S . Identifying psychosocial variables in patients with acute work-related low back pain: the importance of fear-avoidance beliefs. Phys Ther. 2002; 82(10):973-83. View

3.
Schultz I, Crook J, Berkowitz J, Meloche G, Milner R, Zuberbier O . Biopsychosocial multivariate predictive model of occupational low back disability. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2002; 27(23):2720-5. DOI: 10.1097/00007632-200212010-00012. View

4.
Sullivan M, Ward L, Tripp D, French D, Adams H, Stanish W . Secondary prevention of work disability: community-based psychosocial intervention for musculoskeletal disorders. J Occup Rehabil. 2005; 15(3):377-92. DOI: 10.1007/s10926-005-5944-7. View

5.
Woby S, Watson P, Roach N, Urmston M . Adjustment to chronic low back pain--the relative influence of fear-avoidance beliefs, catastrophizing, and appraisals of control. Behav Res Ther. 2004; 42(7):761-74. DOI: 10.1016/S0005-7967(03)00195-5. View