» Articles » PMID: 18957056

Synergistic Interaction Between Trifluorothymidine and Docetaxel is Sequence Dependent

Overview
Journal Cancer Sci
Specialty Oncology
Date 2008 Oct 30
PMID 18957056
Citations 13
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Docetaxel is a microtubule inhibitor that has actions in the S and G(2)-M phase of the cell cycle. The pyrimidine trifluorothymidine (TFT) induces DNA damage and an arrest in the G(2)-M phase. TFT, as part of TAS-102, has been clinically evaluated as an oral chemotherapeutic agent in colon and gastric cancer. The aim of the present study was to determine the optimal administration sequence of TFT and docetaxel and to investigate the underlying mechanism of cytotoxicity. Drug interactions were examined by sulforhodamine B assays and subsequent combination index analyses, and for long-term effects the clonogenic assay was used. A preincubation with docetaxel was synergistic in sulforhodamine B (combination index 0.6-0.8) and clonogenic assays, and was accompanied by a time-dependent cell death induction (17-36%), the occurrence of polynucleation (22%), and mitotic spindle inhibition as determined by flow cytometry and immunostaining. Interestingly, administration of TFT followed by the combination displayed strong antagonistic activity, and was accompanied by less polynucleation and cell death induction than the synergistic combinations. Western blotting showed that the G(2)-M-phase arrest (25-50%) was accompanied by phosphorylation of Chk2 and dephosphorylation of cdc25c in the synergistic combinations. Together, this indicates that synergistic activity requires docetaxel to initiate mitotic failure prior to the activation of TFT damage signaling, whereas antagonism is a result of TFT cell cycle-arrested cells being less susceptible to docetaxel. Caspase 3 activation was low after docetaxel, suggestive of caspase-independent mechanisms of cell death. Taken together, our models indicate that combination treatment with docetaxel and TFT displays strong synergy when docetaxel is given first, thus providing clues for possible clinical studies.

Citing Articles

Non-thermal plasma as promising anti-cancer therapy against bladder cancer by inducing DNA damage and cell cycle arrest.

Stoof J, Kalmoua Z, Sobota A, Brakenhoff R, Stigter M, Pham T Sci Rep. 2025; 15(1):2334.

PMID: 39824909 PMC: 11742390. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-025-85568-0.


Mechanisms underlying reversed TRAIL sensitivity in acquired bortezomib-resistant non-small cell lung cancer cells.

De Wilt L, Sobocki B, Jansen G, Tabeian H, de Jong S, Peters G Cancer Drug Resist. 2024; 7:12.

PMID: 38835345 PMC: 11149110. DOI: 10.20517/cdr.2024.14.


Protective autophagy by thymidine causes resistance to rapamycin in colorectal cancer cells .

Bijnsdorp I, Peters G Cancer Drug Resist. 2022; 4(3):719-727.

PMID: 35582304 PMC: 9094079. DOI: 10.20517/cdr.2021.21.


6-Thioguanine Inhibits Herpes Simplex Virus 1 Infection of Eyes.

Chen D, Liu Y, Zhang F, You Q, Ma W, Wu J Microbiol Spectr. 2021; 9(3):e0064621.

PMID: 34730435 PMC: 8567252. DOI: 10.1128/Spectrum.00646-21.


Glaucarubinone sensitizes KB cells to paclitaxel by inhibiting ABC transporters via ROS-dependent and p53-mediated activation of apoptotic signaling pathways.

Karthikeyan S, Hoti S, Nazeer Y, Hegde H Oncotarget. 2016; 7(27):42353-42373.

PMID: 27304668 PMC: 5173140. DOI: 10.18632/oncotarget.9865.


References
1.
Zhao J, Kim J, Reed E, Li Q . Molecular mechanism of antitumor activity of taxanes in lung cancer (Review). Int J Oncol. 2005; 27(1):247-56. View

2.
Temmink O, Emura T, de Bruin M, Fukushima M, Peters G . Therapeutic potential of the dual-targeted TAS-102 formulation in the treatment of gastrointestinal malignancies. Cancer Sci. 2007; 98(6):779-89. PMC: 11158373. DOI: 10.1111/j.1349-7006.2007.00477.x. View

3.
Motwani M, Rizzo C, Sirotnak F, She Y, Schwartz G . Flavopiridol enhances the effect of docetaxel in vitro and in vivo in human gastric cancer cells. Mol Cancer Ther. 2003; 2(6):549-55. View

4.
Huizing M, Misser V, Pieters R, Ten Bokkel Huinink W, Veenhof C, Vermorken J . Taxanes: a new class of antitumor agents. Cancer Invest. 1995; 13(4):381-404. DOI: 10.3109/07357909509031919. View

5.
Gligorov J, Lotz J . Preclinical pharmacology of the taxanes: implications of the differences. Oncologist. 2004; 9 Suppl 2:3-8. DOI: 10.1634/theoncologist.9-suppl_2-3. View