» Articles » PMID: 18948021

Percutaneous Peritoneovenous Shunt for Treatment of Refractory Ascites

Overview
Date 2008 Oct 25
PMID 18948021
Citations 9
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Purpose: To evaluate the usefulness of a percutaneously placed peritoneovenous shunt (PVS) in patients with refractory ascites.

Materials And Methods: Under fluoroscopic and ultrasonographic (US) guidance, the authors placed a PVS in 55 patients (39 men and 16 women; mean age, 56 years) with refractory ascites and symptomatic abdominal distention. The cause of ascites was liver cirrhosis (n = 36), carcinomatosis (n = 17), ruptured cysts with polycystic kidney disease (n = 1), and idiopathic refractory ascites (n = 1). The authors retrospectively evaluated technical feasibility, shunt patency, complications, and clinical outcomes of each patient.

Results: The technical success rate was 100%, and symptomatic improvement was achieved in all but one patient. Complications occurred in 17 of the 55 patients (31%): five patients had variceal bleeding; three patients had ascites leakage; two patients each had disseminated intravascular coagulopathy, transient abdominal pain, shunt infection, and venous thrombosis; and one patient had pulmonary thromboembolism. Thirty patients (54%) died 2-690 days after the procedure (mean, 117 days), and their lifetime shunt patency was 84%. Eight patients were lost to follow-up. Seventeen patients were alive for 60-1,200 days, and their shunt patency was 71%. There was no significant difference in shunt patency between the two groups with benign and malignant ascites.

Conclusions: The percutaneous placement of a PVS was a technically feasible and effective method for symptomatic relief of refractory ascites.

Citing Articles

Treatment of Chylous Ascites with Peritoneovenous Shunt (Denver Shunt) following Retroperitoneal Lymph Node Dissection in Patients with Urological Malignancies: Update of Efficacy and Predictors of Complications.

Yarmohammadi H, Schilsky J, Durack J, Brody L, Asenbaum U, Velayati S J Urol. 2020; 204(4):818-823.

PMID: 32364837 PMC: 9426855. DOI: 10.1097/JU.0000000000001121.


Current approaches to the management of patients with cirrhotic ascites.

Garbuzenko D, Arefyev N World J Gastroenterol. 2019; 25(28):3738-3752.

PMID: 31391769 PMC: 6676543. DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v25.i28.3738.


The influence of a peritoneovenous shunt for cirrhotic and malignant intractable ascites on renal function.

Segawa T, Kato K, Kawashima K, Suzuki T, Ehara S Acta Radiol Open. 2018; 7(3):2058460118764208.

PMID: 29623218 PMC: 5881988. DOI: 10.1177/2058460118764208.


Symptomatic Fluid Drainage: Peritoneovenous Shunt Placement.

Yarmohammadi H, Getrajdman G Semin Intervent Radiol. 2017; 34(4):343-348.

PMID: 29249858 PMC: 5730438. DOI: 10.1055/s-0037-1608705.


Therapeutic Application of Percutaneous Peritoneovenous (Denver) Shunt in Treating Chylous Ascites in Cancer Patients.

Yarmohammadi H, Brody L, Erinjeri J, Covey A, Boas F, Ziv E J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2016; 27(5):665-73.

PMID: 26965362 PMC: 5060070. DOI: 10.1016/j.jvir.2015.12.014.