[Orthodontic Measuring and Simulating Systems (OMSS) for the Static and Dynamic Analysis of Tooth Movement]

Overview

Journal Fortschr Kieferorthop

Specialty Dentistry

Date 1991 Jun 1

PMID 1894242

Citations 25

Authors

D Drescher

C Bourauel

M Thier

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

An orthodontic measurement and simulation system (OMSS) is presented. The major components of this system are two measuring tables each comprising a force/torque sensor and a motor driven, fully three-dimensionally adjustable positioning stage. The force/torque sensors are capable of measuring simultaneously all forces and torques acting on a tooth. Using the computer program "OMSS" which runs on a personal computer, several different measurements can be conducted. On the one hand, the system supports absolute measurements such as the registration of a force/deflection diagram. Furthermore, even multidimensional force/deflection- or torque/distance curves can be measured. On the other hand, simulations of orthodontic tooth movement can be conducted. In such simulations, the force system acting on a tooth is measured and the resulting tooth movements are calculated. By using this "computer typodont", not only the static but the dynamic behaviour of orthodontic appliances can be studied. The application of this system is demonstrated by the analysis of several orthodontic problems.

Citing Articles

Comparative evaluation of different debonding and reconditioning methods for orthodontic ceramic brackets regarding effectiveness for reuse : An in vitro study.

Grosch K, Meister J, Raval S, Fouda A, Bourauel C J Orofac Orthop. 2023; 86(1):11-23.

PMID: 37318554 PMC: 11753313. DOI: 10.1007/s00056-023-00469-z.

Precision of slot widths and torque transmission of in-office 3D printed brackets : An in vitro study.

Bauer C, Scheurer M, Bourauel C, Kretzer J, Roser C, Lux C J Orofac Orthop. 2023; 85(5):327-339.

PMID: 36862188 PMC: 11358261. DOI: 10.1007/s00056-023-00460-8.

Sliding behaviour and surface quality after static air polishing of conventional and modern bracket materials : In vitro analysis.

Hodecker L, Bourauel C, Braumann B, Kruse T, Christ H, Scharf S J Orofac Orthop. 2021; 84(2):110-124.

PMID: 34554279 PMC: 9958151. DOI: 10.1007/s00056-021-00352-9.

Mechanical properties of different esthetic and conventional orthodontic wires in bending tests : An in vitro study.

Alobeid A, Dirk C, Reimann S, El-Bialy T, Jager A, Bourauel C J Orofac Orthop. 2016; 78(3):241-252.

PMID: 27942768 DOI: 10.1007/s00056-016-0078-5.

Friction behavior of self-ligating and conventional brackets with different ligature systems.

Szczupakowski A, Reimann S, Dirk C, Keilig L, Weber A, Jager A J Orofac Orthop. 2016; 77(4):287-95.

PMID: 27220902 DOI: 10.1007/s00056-016-0035-3.

References

Mitchell D, Boone R, FERGUSON J . Correlation of tooth movement with variable forces in the cat. Angle Orthod. 1973; 43(2):154-61. DOI: 10.1043/0003-3219(1973)043<0154:COTMWV>2.0.CO;2. View

Vardimon A, GRABER T, Voss L, Muller T . Functional orthopedic magnetic appliance (FOMA) III--modus operandi. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1990; 97(2):135-48. DOI: 10.1016/0889-5406(90)70087-s. View

Burstone C, Pryputniewicz R . Holographic determination of centers of rotation produced by orthodontic forces. Am J Orthod. 1980; 77(4):396-409. DOI: 10.1016/0002-9416(80)90105-0. View

Roberts 3rd W, Chacker F, Burstone C . A segmental approach to mandibular molar uprighting. Am J Orthod. 1982; 81(3):177-84. DOI: 10.1016/0002-9416(82)90051-3. View

Diedrich P . [Uprighting tipped molars as a pre-prosthetic and periodontitis-preventive measure]. Dtsch Zahnarztl Z. 1986; 41(2):159-63. View

Meyer R, Bachmann K, Harmsen B . [The computer simulation of orthodontic tooth movements]. Fortschr Kieferorthop. 1990; 51(4):238-42. DOI: 10.1007/BF02167356. View

Burstone C, Koenig H . Force systems from an ideal arch. Am J Orthod. 1974; 65(3):270-89. DOI: 10.1016/s0002-9416(74)90332-7. View

Hershey H, Houghton C, Burstone C . Unilateral face-bows: a theoretical and laboratory analysis. Am J Orthod. 1981; 79(3):229-49. DOI: 10.1016/0002-9416(81)90072-5. View

Solonche D, Burstone C, Vanderby Jr R . A device for determining the mechanical behavior of orthodontic appliances. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 1977; 24(6):538-9. DOI: 10.1109/tbme.1977.326167. View

10.

Christiansen R, Burstone C . Centers of rotation within the periodontal space. Am J Orthod. 1969; 55(4):353-69. DOI: 10.1016/0002-9416(69)90143-2. View

11.

DELLINGER E . A clinical assessment of the Active Vertical Corrector--a nonsurgical alternative for skeletal open bite treatment. Am J Orthod. 1986; 89(5):428-36. DOI: 10.1016/0002-9416(86)90075-8. View

12.

Boester C, Johnston L . A clinical investigation of the concepts of differential and optimal force in canine retraction. Angle Orthod. 1974; 44(2):113-9. DOI: 10.1043/0003-3219(1974)044<0113:ACIOTC>2.0.CO;2. View

13.

Pedersen E, Andersen K, Gjessing P . Electronic determination of centres of rotation produced by orthodontic force systems. Eur J Orthod. 1990; 12(3):272-80. DOI: 10.1093/ejo/12.3.272. View

14.

Kiliaridis S, Egermark I, Thilander B . Anterior open bite treatment with magnets. Eur J Orthod. 1990; 12(4):447-57. DOI: 10.1093/ejo/12.4.447. View