» Articles » PMID: 18941858

Which Approach for Total Hip Arthroplasty: Anterolateral or Posterior?

Overview
Publisher Wolters Kluwer
Specialty Orthopedics
Date 2008 Oct 23
PMID 18941858
Citations 28
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Unlabelled: The best approach to use when performing THA is controversial. We did a prospective, nonrandomized multicenter study of 1089 THAs to evaluate patient-centered hip scores and dislocation and revision rates when comparing anterolateral and posterior hip approaches at 5 years' followup. Patients were divided into two groups depending on which surgical approach was used: anterolateral or posterior. The primary outcome measure was change in Oxford hip score. At 5 years, there were no differences in change in Oxford hip score and in dislocation or revision rates between the groups.

Level Of Evidence: Level II, therapeutic study. See the Guidelines for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Citing Articles

Effect of surgical approach to hip arthroplasty on postoperative pain and mobilization and on efficacy of intrathecal oxytocin for pain.

Shields J, Ijebuonwu D, Korn E, Mueller A, Houle T, Langfitt M medRxiv. 2025; .

PMID: 40061318 PMC: 11888492. DOI: 10.1101/2025.02.22.25322560.


A Modified Transgluteal Approach Sparing Abductor Function in Total Hip Arthroplasty Results in a Low Postoperative Dislocation Rate: A Retrospective Study of Short- and Long-Term Outcomes.

Ward M, Date A, Yeoh T, Li P Cureus. 2024; 16(11):e73804.

PMID: 39552735 PMC: 11568664. DOI: 10.7759/cureus.73804.


Multivariate Analysis of Risk Factors for In-Hospital Dislocation Following Primary Total Hip Arthroplasty.

Jones H, Hinkle A, Liu Y, Sambandam S J Clin Med. 2024; 13(12).

PMID: 38929981 PMC: 11204957. DOI: 10.3390/jcm13123456.


No clinically relevant difference in patient-reported outcomes between the direct superior approach and the posterolateral or anterior approach for primary total hip arthroplasty: analysis of 37,976 primary hip arthroplasties in the Dutch....

van Dooren B, Peters R, Van Steenbergen L, Post R, Ettema H, Bolder S Acta Orthop. 2023; 94:543-549.

PMID: 37905684 PMC: 10617518. DOI: 10.2340/17453674.2023.23729.


Limping and patient satisfaction after primary total hip arthroplasty: a registry-based cohort study.

Bonnefoy-Mazure A, Poncet A, Gonzalez A, Barea C, Hannouche D, Lubbeke A Acta Orthop. 2022; 93:602-608.

PMID: 35770370 PMC: 9244825. DOI: 10.2340/17453674.2022.3489.


References
1.
Bauer R, Kerschbaumer F, Poisel S, Oberthaler W . The transgluteal approach to the hip joint. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg (1978). 1979; 95(1-2):47-9. DOI: 10.1007/BF00379169. View

2.
Muller M . Total hip prostheses. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1970; 72:46-68. View

3.
Gore D, Murray M, Sepic S, Gardner G . Anterolateral compared to posterior approach in total hip arthroplasty: differences in component positioning, hip strength, and hip motion. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1982; (165):180-7. View

4.
Woo R, Morrey B . Dislocations after total hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1982; 64(9):1295-306. View

5.
Roberts J, Fu F, McClain E, FERGUSON Jr A . A comparison of the posterolateral and anterolateral approaches to total hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1984; (187):205-10. View