» Articles » PMID: 18936872

Relationships of the Musculocutaneous Nerve and the Coracobrachialis During Coracoid Abutment Procedure (Latarjet Procedure)

Overview
Date 2008 Oct 22
PMID 18936872
Citations 22
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Purpose: The aim of this study was first to define first the anatomical relationships between the musculocutaneous nerve and the coracobrachialis, and then the induced modifications of these relationships by a preglenoid transposition of the vertical part of the coracoid process.

Materials And Methods: Twenty-one embalmed adult trunks and upper limb were dissected. First the coracobrachialis and the musculocutaneous nerve were identified through a deltopectoral approach. We measured the distances between the lateral cord of the brachial plexus and the entry point of the nerve, between the inferior tip of the tip of the coracoid process and the penetration of the nerve or its twigs, and finally the angle between the general axis of the coracobrachialis and the axis of the musculocutaneous nerve. The same measures were performed after the coracoid bone block abutment.

Results: Proximal motor branches destined to the coracobrachialis varied from 0 to 3. Mean distance between the lateral cord of the brachial plexus and entry point of the nerve into the muscle was 47.2 mm before and 48.43 mm after the coracoid transfer. Mean angulations between the nerve and the muscle was 121 degrees before and 136 degrees after the transfer of the coracoid process. Mean distance between the inferior tip of the coracoid process and entry point of the nerve into the muscle was 55.7 mm, reduced to 48.6 mm after the coracoid transposition. Finally, the distance between the tip of the coracoid and the first motor twig entering the coracobrachialis was less than 50 mm in 75% of the cases with a mean value of 40.6 mm.

Conclusions: Lesion of the musculocutaneous nerve is a known complication of the coracoid bone block abutment procedure (Latarjet-Bristow). From this study we know that they are due to lengthening of the nerve and modification of the penetration angle of the nerve into the coracobrachialis. We also infer that some motor nerve destined to the coracobrachialis might be damaged during the proximal medial release of the muscle after the detachment of the pectoralis minor muscle.

Citing Articles

An Anatomical Study of the Feasibility of the Pectoralis Minor Transfer for Subscapular Deficiency: An Investigation of the Association Between the Transferred Muscle and the Musculocutaneous and Axillary Nerves.

Gantsos A, Giotis D, Konstantinidis C, Reinares F, Polyzos A, Papazachariadis O Cureus. 2024; 16(11):e73031.

PMID: 39640115 PMC: 11618469. DOI: 10.7759/cureus.73031.


Revisiting the Muscles and Nerves of Anterior Compartment of the Arm: A Case Report.

Anacur B, Ogut E, Barut C Medeni Med J. 2024; 39(3):230-234.

PMID: 39350578 PMC: 11572219. DOI: 10.4274/MMJ.galenos.2024.78380.


A Review of the Typical Course of the Musculocutaneous Nerve into the Coracobrachialis Muscle: Its Variability and Possible Clinical Implications.

Pantekidis I, Piagkou M, Koutserimpas C, Samolis A, Tsakotos G, Kostares M Acta Med Acad. 2023; 52(2):95-104.

PMID: 37933506 PMC: 10698363. DOI: 10.5644/ama2006-124.409.


Changes in Scapular Function, Shoulder Strength, and Range of Motion Occur After Latarjet Procedure.

van de Kuit A, Verweij L, Priester-Vink S, Veeger H, van den Bekerom M Arthrosc Sports Med Rehabil. 2023; 5(6):100804.

PMID: 37822673 PMC: 10562159. DOI: 10.1016/j.asmr.2023.100804.


A Bilateral Symmetric Accessory Coracobrachialis Muscle Combined With an Interconnection of the Musculocutaneous Nerve With the Median Nerve.

Tsakotos G, Triantafyllou G, Olewnik L, Georgiev G, Koutserimpas C, Karampelias V Cureus. 2023; 15(8):e43496.

PMID: 37719489 PMC: 10500966. DOI: 10.7759/cureus.43496.


References
1.
Gazielly D . [Results of anterior coracoid abutments performed in 1995: apropos of 89 cases]. Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot. 2000; 86 Suppl 1:103-6. View

2.
Green M, Christensen K . Arthroscopic versus open Bankart procedures: a comparison of early morbidity and complications. Arthroscopy. 1993; 9(4):371-4. DOI: 10.1016/s0749-8063(05)80308-1. View

3.
MAY Jr V . A modified Bristow operation for anterior recurrent dislocation of the shoulder. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1970; 52(5):1010-6. View

4.
Green M, Christensen K . Arthroscopic Bankart procedure: two- to five-year followup with clinical correlation to severity of glenoid labral lesion. Am J Sports Med. 1995; 23(3):276-81. DOI: 10.1177/036354659502300304. View

5.
Burkhart S, De Beer J . Traumatic glenohumeral bone defects and their relationship to failure of arthroscopic Bankart repairs: significance of the inverted-pear glenoid and the humeral engaging Hill-Sachs lesion. Arthroscopy. 2000; 16(7):677-94. DOI: 10.1053/jars.2000.17715. View