» Articles » PMID: 18936788

Common Mistakes in the Clinical Use of Bone Mineral Density Testing

Overview
Specialty Rheumatology
Date 2008 Oct 22
PMID 18936788
Citations 24
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Bone mineral density (BMD) testing is used to diagnose osteoporosis, assess fracture risk and monitor changes in BMD over time. A variety of devices and technologies are used to measure BMD or other surrogate markers of bone strength. Measurements obtained with these devices are often reported according to different proprietary standards, and the comparability of values obtained with different instruments is often poor. In addition, there is a high degree of variability in the skills of the technologists performing the tests and the clinicians interpreting the results. Heterogeneity in the guidelines for using BMD measurements together with poor-quality BMD testing and reporting can result in inappropriate clinical decisions, causing unnecessary worry and expense for the patient and possible harm due to unnecessary treatment or treatment being withheld. This Review describes and discusses the mistakes commonly made in BMD testing, and emphasizes the importance of maintaining high-quality standards in order to optimize patient management.

Citing Articles

Quality assessment in bone densitometry: a case of incorrect hip analysis.

Xu H, Gabriel M, James J BJR Case Rep. 2024; 10(6):uaae038.

PMID: 39494353 PMC: 11530240. DOI: 10.1093/bjrcr/uaae038.


Microwave Vertebrae Strength Probe Development: Robust and Fast Phase Unwrapping Technique.

Meaney P, Mattsson V, Augustine R, Brisby H IEEE J Electromagn RF Microw Med Biol. 2024; 8(1):78-83.

PMID: 39371048 PMC: 11452015. DOI: 10.1109/jerm.2024.3363148.


Real-life effects of pharmacological osteoporosis treatments on bone mineral density by quantitative computed tomography.

Boehm E, Sauer C, Baur-Melnyk A, Biebl J, Harada S, Wegener B J Bone Miner Metab. 2024; 42(6):741-753.

PMID: 39287797 DOI: 10.1007/s00774-024-01553-z.


Predicting Structural Properties of Cortical Bone by Combining Ultrasonic Attenuation and an Artificial Neural Network (ANN): 2-D FDTD Study.

Mohanty K, Yousefian O, Karbalaeisadegh Y, Ulrich M, Muller M Image Anal Recognit. 2024; 11662:407-417.

PMID: 38288296 PMC: 10823500. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-27202-9_37.


Transmission-Based Vertebrae Strength Probe Development: Far Field Probe Property Extraction and Integrated Machine Vision Distance Validation Experiments.

Meaney P, Augustine R, Welteke A, Pfrommer B, Pearson A, Brisby H Sensors (Basel). 2023; 23(10).

PMID: 37430734 PMC: 10220895. DOI: 10.3390/s23104819.


References
1.
Cranney A, Tugwell P, Wells G, Guyatt G . Meta-analyses of therapies for postmenopausal osteoporosis. I. Systematic reviews of randomized trials in osteoporosis: introduction and methodology. Endocr Rev. 2002; 23(4):496-507. DOI: 10.1210/er.2001-1002. View

2.
Hans D, Shepherd J, Schwartz E, Reid D, Blake G, Fordham J . Peripheral dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry in the management of osteoporosis: the 2007 ISCD Official Positions. J Clin Densitom. 2008; 11(1):188-206. DOI: 10.1016/j.jocd.2007.12.012. View

3.
Lenchik L, Kiebzak G, Blunt B . What is the role of serial bone mineral density measurements in patient management?. J Clin Densitom. 2002; 5 Suppl:S29-38. DOI: 10.1385/jcd:5:3s:s29. View

4.
Lotz J, Cheal E, Hayes W . Fracture prediction for the proximal femur using finite element models: Part I--Linear analysis. J Biomech Eng. 1991; 113(4):353-60. DOI: 10.1115/1.2895412. View

5.
Mazess R, Chesnut 3rd C, McClung M, Genant H . Enhanced precision with dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry. Calcif Tissue Int. 1992; 51(1):14-7. DOI: 10.1007/BF00296209. View