» Articles » PMID: 18923113

Socioeconomic Status and Improvements in Lifestyle, Coronary Risk Factors, and Quality of Life: the Multisite Cardiac Lifestyle Intervention Program

Overview
Specialty Public Health
Date 2008 Oct 17
PMID 18923113
Citations 30
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objectives: We sought to clarify whether patients of low socioeconomic status (SES) can make lifestyle changes and show improved outcomes in coronary heart disease (CHD), similar to patients with higher SES.

Methods: We examined lifestyle, risk factors, and quality of life over 3 months, by SES and gender, in 869 predominantly White, nonsmoking CHD patients (34% female) in the insurance-sponsored Multisite Cardiac Lifestyle Intervention Program. SES was defined primarily by education.

Results: At baseline, less-educated participants were more likely to be disadvantaged (e.g., past smoking, sedentary lifestyle, high fat diet, overweight, depression) than were higher-SES participants. By 3 months, participants at all SES levels reported consuming 10% or less dietary fat, exercising 3.5 hours per week or more, and practicing stress management 5.5 hours per week or more. These self-reports were substantiated by improvements in risk factors (e.g., 5-kg weight loss, and improved blood pressure, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol, and exercise capacity; P < .001), and accompanied by improvements in well-being (e.g., depression, hostility, quality of life; P < .001).

Conclusions: The observed benefits for CHD patients with low SES indicate that broadening accessibility of lifestyle programs through health insurance should be strongly encouraged.

Citing Articles

Measuring health-related quality of life in cardiovascular disease using a novel patient-centred and disease-specific patient-reported outcome measure.

Singh T, Ties D, Groot H, Krabbe P, van der Harst P Int J Cardiol Cardiovasc Risk Prev. 2025; 24():200357.

PMID: 39802169 PMC: 11720887. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijcrp.2024.200357.


Lifestyle medicine: a cultural shift in medicine that can drive integration of care.

Fallows E Future Healthc J. 2024; 10(3):226-231.

PMID: 38162213 PMC: 10753218. DOI: 10.7861/fhj.2023-0094.


Distinct Features of Vascular Diseases in COVID-19.

Ceasovschih A, Sorodoc V, Shor A, Haliga R, Roth L, Lionte C J Inflamm Res. 2023; 16:2783-2800.

PMID: 37435114 PMC: 10332421. DOI: 10.2147/JIR.S417691.


Racial/ethnic and socioeconomic disparities in weight outcomes, cardiovascular events, and mortality in the look AHEAD trial.

Cromer S, Meigs J, Wexler D Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2022; 192:110095.

PMID: 36174779 PMC: 10966613. DOI: 10.1016/j.diabres.2022.110095.


Comparing Genetic and Socioenvironmental Contributions to Ethnic Differences in C-Reactive Protein.

Nagar S, Conley A, Sharma S, Rishishwar L, Jordan I, Marino-Ramirez L Front Genet. 2021; 12:738485.

PMID: 34733313 PMC: 8558394. DOI: 10.3389/fgene.2021.738485.


References
1.
Cannistra L, Balady G, OMALLEY C, Weiner D, Ryan T . Comparison of the clinical profile and outcome of women and men in cardiac rehabilitation. Am J Cardiol. 1992; 69(16):1274-9. DOI: 10.1016/0002-9149(92)91220-x. View

2.
Lavie C, Milani R . Benefits of cardiac rehabilitation and exercise training in elderly women. Am J Cardiol. 1997; 79(5):664-6. DOI: 10.1016/s0002-9149(96)00835-1. View

3.
Cohen S, Kamarck T, Mermelstein R . A global measure of perceived stress. J Health Soc Behav. 1983; 24(4):385-96. View

4.
Berkman L, Macintyre S . The measurement of social class in health studies: old measures and new formulations. IARC Sci Publ. 1997; (138):51-64. View

5.
Cooper R, Cutler J, Desvigne-Nickens P, Fortmann S, Friedman L, Havlik R . Trends and disparities in coronary heart disease, stroke, and other cardiovascular diseases in the United States: findings of the national conference on cardiovascular disease prevention. Circulation. 2000; 102(25):3137-47. DOI: 10.1161/01.cir.102.25.3137. View