» Articles » PMID: 1885875

Targeting Strategies: an Overview of Criteria and Outcomes

Overview
Specialty Geriatrics
Date 1991 Sep 1
PMID 1885875
Citations 23
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Researchers generally agree that Geriatric Evaluation and Management (GEM) Units are effective only when they are targeted at a specific group of frail, elderly patients who are most likely to benefit. Such patients are those who are neither too sick (eg, severely demented or moribund) nor too well. Various strategies for identifying such patients have been employed by investigators with little consensus on the most efficient targeting criteria. Criteria most often use for inclusion in GEM programs are various combinations of patient age, degree of functional impairment, presence of geriatric conditions (eg falls, incontinence, confusion), particular diagnostic conditions (eg, multiple disorders), and psychosocial conditions (eg, living alone, recent bereavement, low income). Commonly used exclusion factors are severe dementia, inevitable nursing home placement, and terminal illness. Outcome studies suggest that beneficial effects of GEM care are most apparent when patients are selected using specific clinical criteria. Future research on targeting should address the potential need for differing criteria in different settings (eg, inpatient vs outpatient GEM units), simplifications of criteria for greatest ease of application, and prospective evaluation of which criteria best predict functional improvement, longer survival, and reduced health care expenditures in response to GEM care.

Citing Articles

Frailty in elderly patients with acute colonic diverticulitis is associated with worse in-hospital outcomes: a nationwide analysis.

Rasheed W, Dweik A, Dharmarpandi G, Saeed A, Sohail A, Shaikh M Ann Gastroenterol. 2024; 37(5):552-558.

PMID: 39238801 PMC: 11372536. DOI: 10.20524/aog.2024.0904.


Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction and Frailty: From Young to Superaged Coexisting HFpEF and Frailty.

Rakisheva A, Soloveva A, Shchendrygina A, Giverts I Int J Heart Fail. 2024; 6(3):93-106.

PMID: 39081641 PMC: 11284337. DOI: 10.36628/ijhf.2023.0064.


Preconditioning Frailty Phenotype Influences Survival and Relapse for Older Allogeneic Transplantation Recipients.

Sung A, Koll T, Gier S, Racioppi A, White G, Lew M Transplant Cell Ther. 2024; 30(4):415.e1-415.e16.

PMID: 38242440 PMC: 11009062. DOI: 10.1016/j.jtct.2024.01.062.


Evaluation of a 3-Item Health Index in Predicting Mortality Risk: A 12-Year Follow-Up Study.

Knight S, Ward M, Duggan E, Xue F, Kenny R, Romero-Ortuno R Diagnostics (Basel). 2023; 13(17).

PMID: 37685339 PMC: 10487174. DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics13172801.


Blood Pressure Signal Entropy as a Novel Marker of Physical Frailty: Results from the FRAILMatics Clinical Cohort.

Knight S, Duggan E, Romero-Ortuno R J Clin Med. 2023; 12(1).

PMID: 36614851 PMC: 9821563. DOI: 10.3390/jcm12010053.