» Articles » PMID: 1884761

Integration of Sensory Information During the Programming of Precision Grip: Comments on the Contributions of Size Cues

Overview
Journal Exp Brain Res
Specialty Neurology
Date 1991 Jan 1
PMID 1884761
Citations 44
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Evidence has recently been given by Gordon et al. (1991a, b) for the use of visually and haptically acquired information in the programming of lifts with the precision grip. The size-related information influences the development of manipulative forces prior to the lift-off, and the force output for larger objects is adjusted for a heavier weight even if the weight of the objects is kept the same. However, the size influences on the force output were small compared to the relative effects of the expected weight in previous trials (Johansson and Westling 1988). In the present study, both the size and weight of objects were changed between consecutive lifts to more fully determine the strength of visual size cues. During most trials, the size and weight covaried (i.e. the weight was proportional to the volume). However, in some trials, only the size was switched while the weight was kept the same to create a mismatch between the size and weight. The forces were still appropriately scaled towards an expected weight proportional to the volume of the object. It was concluded that visual size cues are highly purposeful. The effects were much larger than previously reported and were similar in magnitude to the effects based upon the expected weight. Thus, the small effects reported in the previous experiments may have been a result of conflicting "size-weight" information.

Citing Articles

Unveiling the invisible: receivers use object weight cues for grip force planning in handover actions.

Kopnarski L, Rudisch J, Kutz D, Voelcker-Rehage C Exp Brain Res. 2024; 242(5):1191-1202.

PMID: 38498154 PMC: 11078835. DOI: 10.1007/s00221-024-06813-y.


Fast Feedback Responses to Categorical Sensorimotor Errors That Do Not Indicate Error Magnitude Are Optimized Based on Short- and Long-Term Memory.

McGarity-Shipley M, Markovik Jantz S, Johansson R, Wolpert D, Flanagan J J Neurosci. 2023; 43(49):8525-8535.

PMID: 37884350 PMC: 10711696. DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1990-22.2023.


Grip Force Adjustments Reflect Prediction of Dynamic Consequences in Varying Gravitoinertial Fields.

White O, Thonnard J, Lefevre P, Hermsdorfer J Front Physiol. 2018; 9:131.

PMID: 29527176 PMC: 5829530. DOI: 10.3389/fphys.2018.00131.


Does the sensorimotor system minimize prediction error or select the most likely prediction during object lifting?.

Cashaback J, McGregor H, Pun H, Buckingham G, Gribble P J Neurophysiol. 2016; 117(1):260-274.

PMID: 27760821 PMC: 5220115. DOI: 10.1152/jn.00609.2016.


How Heavy Is an Illusory Length?.

de Brouwer A, Smeets J, Plaisier M Iperception. 2016; 7(5):2041669516669155.

PMID: 27708753 PMC: 5034333. DOI: 10.1177/2041669516669155.


References
1.
von Hofsten C, Ronnqvist L . Preparation for grasping an object: a developmental study. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 1988; 14(4):610-21. DOI: 10.1037//0096-1523.14.4.610. View

2.
Gordon A, Forssberg H, Johansson R, Westling G . Visual size cues in the programming of manipulative forces during precision grip. Exp Brain Res. 1991; 83(3):477-82. DOI: 10.1007/BF00229824. View

3.
Gordon A, Forssberg H, Johansson R, Westling G . The integration of haptically acquired size information in the programming of precision grip. Exp Brain Res. 1991; 83(3):483-8. DOI: 10.1007/BF00229825. View

4.
Jeannerod M . The formation of finger grip during prehension. A cortically mediated visuomotor pattern. Behav Brain Res. 1986; 19(2):99-116. DOI: 10.1016/0166-4328(86)90008-2. View

5.
Johansson R, Westling G . Coordinated isometric muscle commands adequately and erroneously programmed for the weight during lifting task with precision grip. Exp Brain Res. 1988; 71(1):59-71. DOI: 10.1007/BF00247522. View