» Articles » PMID: 18842896

Central Contributions to Acoustic Variation in Birdsong

Overview
Journal J Neurosci
Specialty Neurology
Date 2008 Oct 10
PMID 18842896
Citations 102
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Birdsong is a learned behavior remarkable for its high degree of stereotypy. Nevertheless, adult birds display substantial rendition-by-rendition variation in the structure of individual song elements or "syllables." Previous work suggests that some of this variation is actively generated by the avian basal ganglia circuitry for purposes of motor exploration. However, it is unknown whether and how natural variations in premotor activity drive variations in syllable structure. Here, we recorded from the premotor nucleus robust nucleus of the arcopallium (RA) in Bengalese finches and measured whether neural activity covaried with syllable structure across multiple renditions of individual syllables. We found that variations in premotor activity were significantly correlated with variations in the acoustic features (pitch, amplitude, and spectral entropy) of syllables in approximately a quarter of all cases. In these cases, individual neural recordings predicted 8.5 +/- 0.3% (mean +/- SE) of the behavioral variation, and in some cases accounted for 25% or more of trial-by-trial variations in acoustic output. The prevalence and strength of neuron-behavior correlations indicate that each acoustic feature is controlled by a large ensemble of neurons that vary their activity in a coordinated manner. Additionally, we found that correlations with pitch (but not other features) were predominantly positive in sign, supporting a model of pitch production based on the anatomy and physiology of the vocal motor apparatus. Collectively, our results indicate that trial-by-trial variations in spectral structure are indeed under central neural control at the level of RA, consistent with the idea that such variation reflects motor exploration.

Citing Articles

Millisecond-scale motor coding precedes sensorimotor learning in songbirds.

Pascual L, Vusirikala A, Nemenman I, Sober S, Pasek M bioRxiv. 2024; .

PMID: 39386477 PMC: 11463345. DOI: 10.1101/2024.09.27.615500.


Note similarities affect syntactic stability in zebra finches.

Mendez J, Cooper B, Goller F J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol. 2024; 211(1):35-52.

PMID: 39133335 DOI: 10.1007/s00359-024-01713-6.


Expansion of learning capacity elicited by interspecific hybridization.

Shibata Y, Toji N, Wang H, Go Y, Wada K Sci Adv. 2024; 10(25):eadn3409.

PMID: 38896617 PMC: 11186503. DOI: 10.1126/sciadv.adn3409.


Lesions in a songbird vocal circuit increase variability in song syntax.

Koparkar A, Warren T, Charlesworth J, Shin S, Brainard M, Veit L Elife. 2024; 13.

PMID: 38635312 PMC: 11026095. DOI: 10.7554/eLife.93272.


A predisposed motor bias shapes individuality in vocal learning.

Toji N, Sawai A, Wang H, Ji Y, Sugioka R, Go Y Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2024; 121(3):e2308837121.

PMID: 38198530 PMC: 10801888. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.2308837121.


References
1.
Tobari Y, Nakamura K, Okanoya K . Sex differences in the telencephalic song control circuitry in Bengalese finches (Lonchura striata var. domestica). Zoolog Sci. 2005; 22(10):1089-94. DOI: 10.2108/zsj.22.1089. View

2.
Vicario D, Nottebohm F . Organization of the zebra finch song control system: I. Representation of syringeal muscles in the hypoglossal nucleus. J Comp Neurol. 1988; 271(3):346-54. DOI: 10.1002/cne.902710305. View

3.
Goller F, SUTHERS R . Role of syringeal muscles in controlling the phonology of bird song. J Neurophysiol. 1996; 76(1):287-300. DOI: 10.1152/jn.1996.76.1.287. View

4.
Olveczky B, Andalman A, Fee M . Vocal experimentation in the juvenile songbird requires a basal ganglia circuit. PLoS Biol. 2005; 3(5):e153. PMC: 1069649. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pbio.0030153. View

5.
Buneo C, Jarvis M, Batista A, Andersen R . Direct visuomotor transformations for reaching. Nature. 2002; 416(6881):632-6. DOI: 10.1038/416632a. View