» Articles » PMID: 18832120

Reproducibility of Tumor Blood Flow Quantification with 15O-water PET

Overview
Journal J Nucl Med
Specialty Nuclear Medicine
Date 2008 Oct 4
PMID 18832120
Citations 14
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Unlabelled: Noninvasive methods for quantifying tumor blood flow (TBF) have a potentially important role in the field of drug development. (15)O-water PET has been used in several studies aimed at monitoring response to novel treatments. Assessing the significance of changes in TBF requires knowledge of the reproducibility of the technique. This article quantifies the reproducibility of the (15)O-water technique for TBF applications.

Methods: A total of 43 pairs of replicate (15)O-water studies were performed on 23 different patients with cancer. TBF was estimated using a standard, single-compartment model, and the replicate data were used to assess the reproducibility of the method.

Results: The magnitude of the differences between replicate flow measurements was found to be proportional to their means. TBF was measured with a within-subject coefficient of variation of 13.4% and a repeatability of 37.1%. The volume of distribution was measured with a within-subject coefficient of variation of 8.6% and a repeatability of 24.0%.

Conclusion: (15)O-water PET can be used to measure TBF with a reproducibility that is consistent with other applications of the technique. The short half-life of the isotope permits multiple replicate studies to be performed during the same imaging session, allowing the reproducibility of the average flow estimate to be adapted to the required task. (15)O-water PET is a powerful and robust tool for TBF quantification.

Citing Articles

Compartmental modeling for blood flow quantification from dynamic O-water PET images of humans: a systematic review.

Rainio O, Klen R Ann Nucl Med. 2025; 39(3):231-246.

PMID: 39832118 PMC: 11829939. DOI: 10.1007/s12149-025-02014-x.


Repeatability of [O]HO PET imaging for lower extremity skeletal muscle perfusion: a test-retest study.

Christensen N, Sorensen J, Bouchelouche K, Madsen M, Buhl C, Tolbod L EJNMMI Res. 2024; 14(1):11.

PMID: 38294730 PMC: 10830956. DOI: 10.1186/s13550-024-01073-x.


Molecular and functional imaging in cancer-targeted therapy: current applications and future directions.

Bai J, Qiu S, Zhang G Signal Transduct Target Ther. 2023; 8(1):89.

PMID: 36849435 PMC: 9971190. DOI: 10.1038/s41392-023-01366-y.


Whole-Body Parametric Imaging of F-FDG PET Using uEXPLORER with Reduced Scanning Time.

Wu Y, Feng T, Zhao Y, Xu T, Fu F, Huang Z J Nucl Med. 2021; 63(4):622-628.

PMID: 34385335 PMC: 8973287. DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.120.261651.


Patient-Specific Characterization of Breast Cancer Hemodynamics Using Image-Guided Computational Fluid Dynamics.

Wu C, Hormuth D, Oliver T, Pineda F, Lorenzo G, Karczmar G IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 2020; 39(9):2760-2771.

PMID: 32086203 PMC: 7438313. DOI: 10.1109/TMI.2020.2975375.


References
1.
Burger C, Goerres G, Schoenes S, Buck A, Lonn A, von Schulthess G . PET attenuation coefficients from CT images: experimental evaluation of the transformation of CT into PET 511-keV attenuation coefficients. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2002; 29(7):922-7. DOI: 10.1007/s00259-002-0796-3. View

2.
Mankoff D, Dunnwald L, Gralow J, Ellis G, Charlop A, Lawton T . Blood flow and metabolism in locally advanced breast cancer: relationship to response to therapy. J Nucl Med. 2002; 43(4):500-9. View

3.
Uren N, Camici P, Melin J, Bol A, de Bruyne B, Radvan J . Effect of aging on myocardial perfusion reserve. J Nucl Med. 1995; 36(11):2032-6. View

4.
DeGrado T, Turkington T, Williams J, Stearns C, Hoffman J, Coleman R . Performance characteristics of a whole-body PET scanner. J Nucl Med. 1994; 35(8):1398-406. View

5.
Saleem A, Yap J, Osman S, Brady F, Suttle B, Lucas S . Modulation of fluorouracil tissue pharmacokinetics by eniluracil: in-vivo imaging of drug action. Lancet. 2000; 355(9221):2125-31. DOI: 10.1016/s0140-6736(00)02380-1. View