» Articles » PMID: 18830632

Lack of Compensatory Body Growth in a High Performance Moose Alces Alces Population

Overview
Journal Oecologia
Date 2008 Oct 3
PMID 18830632
Citations 11
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Considerable work has been done on disentangling important factors determining early development in body size, yet our knowledge of the extent to which animals living under varying conditions can achieve catch-up growth for a bad start in life is limited. Here, we investigated how body mass at the age of 8 months influenced adult body mass in a moose Alces alces population living under excellent environmental conditions on the island of Vega in northern Norway. We also investigated if mother age and birth date effects on calf body mass persisted until adulthood. We show that neither males nor females were able to show compensatory growth before they reached adulthood, and that part of the variation in adult body mass may have been due to variation in mother age and date of birth. The pattern observed in males can be related to their growth strategy in relation to reproduction, while such results were not expected in females where size-dependent start of reproduction is likely to interact with body growth. We suggest that the good environmental conditions experienced on Vega led to females having small somatic costs of an early start of reproduction or that larger females were able to acquire more resources for growth than their smaller conspecifics. In both cases, females that postpone their first reproduction may not be able to achieve catch-up growth for their lower early body mass compared to females that start reproduction at an early age. Our results concur with previous studies indicating that compensatory growth is weak in moose, increasing the likelihood that variation in life history characters are also transferred between generations.

Citing Articles

Many lifetime growth trajectories for a single mammal.

Veylit L, Saether B, Gaillard J, Baubet E, Gamelon M Ecol Evol. 2021; 11(21):14789-14804.

PMID: 34765141 PMC: 8571586. DOI: 10.1002/ece3.8164.


Varied diets, including broadleaved forage, are important for a large herbivore species inhabiting highly modified landscapes.

Felton A, Holmstrom E, Malmsten J, Felton A, Cromsigt J, Edenius L Sci Rep. 2020; 10(1):1904.

PMID: 32024896 PMC: 7002458. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-020-58673-5.


Towards a predictive conservation biology: the devil is in the behaviour.

Saether B, Engen S Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2019; 374(1781):20190013.

PMID: 31352892 PMC: 6710570. DOI: 10.1098/rstb.2019.0013.


Social influences on survival and reproduction: Insights from a long-term study of wild baboons.

Alberts S J Anim Ecol. 2018; 88(1):47-66.

PMID: 30033518 PMC: 6340732. DOI: 10.1111/1365-2656.12887.


Fitness correlates of age at primiparity in a hunted moose population.

Markussen S, Loison A, Herfindal I, Solberg E, Haanes H, Roed K Oecologia. 2017; 186(2):447-458.

PMID: 29197974 DOI: 10.1007/s00442-017-4021-2.


References
1.
Sand H . Life history patterns in female moose (Alces alces): the relationship between age, body size, fecundity and environmental conditions. Oecologia. 2017; 106(2):212-220. DOI: 10.1007/BF00328601. View

2.
Lindstrom . Early development and fitness in birds and mammals. Trends Ecol Evol. 1999; 14(9):343-348. DOI: 10.1016/s0169-5347(99)01639-0. View

3.
Saether B . Environmental stochasticity and population dynamics of large herbivores: a search for mechanisms. Trends Ecol Evol. 2011; 12(4):143-9. DOI: 10.1016/s0169-5347(96)10068-9. View

4.
Roff D, Fairbairn D . The evolution of trade-offs: where are we?. J Evol Biol. 2007; 20(2):433-47. DOI: 10.1111/j.1420-9101.2006.01255.x. View

5.
Green W, Rothstein A . Trade-offs between growth and reproduction in female bison. Oecologia. 2017; 86(4):521-527. DOI: 10.1007/BF00318318. View