» Articles » PMID: 18823449

Validity of Selected AHRQ Patient Safety Indicators Based on VA National Surgical Quality Improvement Program Data

Overview
Journal Health Serv Res
Specialty Health Services
Date 2008 Oct 1
PMID 18823449
Citations 44
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objectives: To examine the criterion validity of the Agency for Health Care Research and Quality (AHRQ) Patient Safety Indicators (PSIs) using clinical data from the Veterans Health Administration (VA) National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP).

Data Sources: Fifty five thousand seven hundred and fifty two matched hospitalizations from 2001 VA inpatient surgical discharge data and NSQIP chart-abstracted data.

Study Design: We examined the sensitivities, specificities, positive predictive values (PPVs), and positive likelihood ratios of five surgical PSIs that corresponded to NSQIP adverse events. We created and tested alternative definitions of each PSI.

Data Collection: FY01 inpatient discharge data were merged with 2001 NSQIP data abstracted from medical records for major noncardiac surgeries.

Principal Findings: Sensitivities were 19-56 percent for original PSI definitions; and 37-63 percent using alternative PSI definitions. PPVs were 22-74 percent and did not improve with modifications. Positive likelihood ratios were 65-524 using original definitions, and 64-744 using alternative definitions. "Postoperative respiratory failure" and "postoperative wound dehiscence" exhibited significant increases in sensitivity after modifications.

Conclusions: PSI sensitivities and PPVs were moderate. For three of the five PSIs, AHRQ has incorporated our alternative, higher sensitivity definitions into current PSI algorithms. Further validation should be considered before most of the PSIs evaluated herein are used to publicly compare or reward hospital performance.

Citing Articles

Safety of inpatient care in surgical settings: cohort study.

Duclos A, Frits M, Iannaccone C, Lipsitz S, Cooper Z, Weissman J BMJ. 2024; 387():e080480.

PMID: 39537329 PMC: 11558683. DOI: 10.1136/bmj-2024-080480.


Evidence for clinician underprescription of and patient non-adherence to guideline-recommended cardiovascular medications among adults with peripheral artery disease: protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis.

de Launay D, Paquet M, Kirkham A, Graham I, Fergusson D, Nagpal S BMJ Open. 2024; 14(3):e076795.

PMID: 38514143 PMC: 10961494. DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-076795.


Estimates of 30-day postoperative pulmonary complications after gastrointestinal endoscopic procedures: A retrospective cohort analysis of a health system population.

Carr Z, Li J, Agarkov D, Gazura M, Karamchandani K PLoS One. 2024; 19(2):e0299137.

PMID: 38394250 PMC: 10889900. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0299137.


Validity of 16 AHRQ Patient Safety Indicators to identify in-hospital complications: a medical record review across nine Swiss hospitals.

Havranek M, Ruter F, Bilger S, Dahlem Y, Oliveira L, Ehbrecht D Int J Qual Health Care. 2023; 35(4).

PMID: 37949115 PMC: 10656600. DOI: 10.1093/intqhc/mzad092.


Association between neuraxial anaesthesia or general anaesthesia for lower limb revascularisation surgery in adults and clinical outcomes: population based comparative effectiveness study.

Roberts D, Nagpal S, Kubelik D, Brandys T, Stelfox H, Lalu M BMJ. 2020; 371:m4104.

PMID: 33239330 PMC: 7687020. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.m4104.


References
1.
Best W, Khuri S, Phelan M, Hur K, Henderson W, Demakis J . Identifying patient preoperative risk factors and postoperative adverse events in administrative databases: results from the Department of Veterans Affairs National Surgical Quality Improvement Program. J Am Coll Surg. 2002; 194(3):257-66. DOI: 10.1016/s1072-7515(01)01183-8. View

2.
Romano P . Asking too much of administrative data?. J Am Coll Surg. 2003; 196(2):337-8; author reply 338-9. DOI: 10.1016/S1072-7515(02)01761-1. View

3.
McCarthy E, Iezzoni L, Davis R, Palmer R, Cahalane M, Hamel M . Does clinical evidence support ICD-9-CM diagnosis coding of complications?. Med Care. 2000; 38(8):868-76. DOI: 10.1097/00005650-200008000-00010. View

4.
Weingart S, Iezzoni L, Davis R, Palmer R, Cahalane M, Hamel M . Use of administrative data to find substandard care: validation of the complications screening program. Med Care. 2000; 38(8):796-806. DOI: 10.1097/00005650-200008000-00004. View

5.
Lawthers A, McCarthy E, Davis R, Peterson L, Palmer R, Iezzoni L . Identification of in-hospital complications from claims data. Is it valid?. Med Care. 2000; 38(8):785-95. DOI: 10.1097/00005650-200008000-00003. View