» Articles » PMID: 18821619

Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Spectroscopy for Monitoring Liver Steatosis

Overview
Date 2008 Sep 30
PMID 18821619
Citations 69
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Purpose: To compare noninvasive MRI and magnetic resonance spectroscopy (MRS) methods with liver biopsy to quantify liver fat content.

Materials And Methods: Quantification of liver fat was compared by liver biopsy, proton MRS, and MRI using in-phase/out-of-phase (IP/OP) and plus/minus fat saturation (+/-FS) techniques. The reproducibility of each MR measure was also determined. An additional group of overweight patients with steatosis underwent hepatic MRI and MRS before and after a six-month weight-loss program.

Results: A close correlation was demonstrated between histological assessment of steatosis and measurement of intrahepatocellular lipid (IHCL) by MRS (r(s) = 0.928, P < 0.0001) and MRI (IP/OP r(s) = 0.942, P < 0.0001; FS r(s) = 0.935, P < 0.0001). Following weight reduction, four of five patients with >5% weight loss had a decrease in IHCL of >or=50%.

Conclusion: These findings suggest that standard MRI protocols provide a rapid, safe, and quantitative assessment of hepatic steatosis. This is important because MRS is not available on all clinical MRI systems. This will enable noninvasive monitoring of the effects of interventions such as weight loss or pharmacotherapy in patients with fatty liver diseases.

Citing Articles

ANN uncertainty estimates in assessing fatty liver content from ultrasound data.

Del Corso G, Pascali M, Caudai C, De Rosa L, Salvati A, Mancini M Comput Struct Biotechnol J. 2024; 24:603-610.

PMID: 39421530 PMC: 11483457. DOI: 10.1016/j.csbj.2024.09.021.


Correlation between ultrasonography and MR proton density fat fraction techniques in evaluating the severity of liver steatosis.

Kizildag B, Baykara M, Yurttutan N, Vicdan H Hepatol Forum. 2024; 5(1):37-43.

PMID: 38283269 PMC: 10809335. DOI: 10.14744/hf.2023.2023.0046.


Validity of an automated screening Dixon technique for quantifying hepatic steatosis in living liver donors.

Song S, Kim H, Choi J, Kim D, Kim B, Lee H Abdom Radiol (NY). 2023; 49(2):406-413.

PMID: 37801142 DOI: 10.1007/s00261-023-04009-6.


Prospective study comparing hepatic steatosis assessment by magnetic resonance imaging and four ultrasound methods in 105 successive patients.

Collin R, Magnin B, Gaillard C, Nicolas C, Abergel A, Buchard B World J Gastroenterol. 2023; 29(22):3548-3560.

PMID: 37389233 PMC: 10303516. DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v29.i22.3548.


How to select the quantitative magnetic resonance technique for subjects with fatty liver: A systematic review.

Li Y, Jiao Y, Chen N, Gao Q, Chen Y, Zhang Y World J Clin Cases. 2022; 10(25):8906-8921.

PMID: 36157636 PMC: 9477046. DOI: 10.12998/wjcc.v10.i25.8906.