» Articles » PMID: 18794686

Assessment of Closing Pressure in Silicone Ahmed FP7 Glaucoma Valves

Overview
Journal J Glaucoma
Date 2008 Sep 17
PMID 18794686
Citations 7
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Purpose: To measure closing pressure in a series of new Model FP7 silicone Ahmed Glaucoma Valves (AGVs), using an in vitro gravity-driven system, in which closing pressure was measured directly from a dual manometer/pressure reservoir.

Method: A straight length of tubing served as an open manometer, which connected via a 3-way stopcock to the inlet of the AGV submerged under 1.5 cm of balanced saline solution (BSS). Six AGV were assessed in 5 sequential trials and the mean inlet pressure at 90 minutes was recorded as the closing pressure. After testing, a single valve was primed a second time using greater force and retested. Control trials were performed with a submerged 26-G cannula opening directly into the BSS bath.

Results: At 90 minutes, the 6 valves equilibrated at a mean inlet pressure of 7.1 mm Hg, with a range from 1.4 to 13.5 mm Hg. Closing pressures at or less than 5 mm Hg were measured in half (3/6) of the valves tested. The average flow of BSS across the valves in the final 30 minutes was less than 1.5x10(-2) microL/min. In the single valve reperfused under greater pressure, the closing pressure increased.

Conclusions: Model FP7 AGVs, in vitro, exhibit significant variability in closing pressure, with half closing at intraocular pressures considered potentially problematic in clinical situations. The results of the high-pressure perfusion experiment suggest that more research into the priming process is required so a precise description can be developed for surgeons.

Citing Articles

Posterior segment complications of Ahmed valve implantation.

Park Y, Cho K BMC Ophthalmol. 2022; 22(1):78.

PMID: 35168587 PMC: 8845380. DOI: 10.1186/s12886-022-02297-y.


Evaluation of the Ultrastructural and In Vitro Flow Properties of the PRESERFLO MicroShunt.

Ibarz Barbera M, Hernandez-Verdejo J, Bragard J, Burguete J, Fernandez L, Rivero P Transl Vis Sci Technol. 2021; 10(13):26.

PMID: 34792556 PMC: 8606849. DOI: 10.1167/tvst.10.13.26.


Conventional glaucoma implants and the new MIGS devices: a comprehensive review of current options and future directions.

Pereira I, van de Wijdeven R, Wyss H, Beckers H, den Toonder J Eye (Lond). 2021; 35(12):3202-3221.

PMID: 34127842 PMC: 8602385. DOI: 10.1038/s41433-021-01595-x.


Assessing risk factors for postoperative hypotony in Ahmed glaucoma valve implantation surgery.

Kaderli A, Demirok G, Uney G, Yakin M, Gunal B, Eksioglu U Int Ophthalmol. 2021; 41(10):3381-3386.

PMID: 34019191 DOI: 10.1007/s10792-021-01900-3.


Is Ahmed Glaucoma Valve Consistent in Performance?.

Choudhari N, Badakere S, Richhariya A, Chittajallu S, Senthil S, Garudadri C Transl Vis Sci Technol. 2018; 7(3):19.

PMID: 29946493 PMC: 6016431. DOI: 10.1167/tvst.7.3.19.